Work done pushing a spring from the side

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the calculation of work done when pushing a spring from the side, specifically addressing the integral formulation for work involving two springs with spring constant ## k ##. The user initially miscalculated the extension of the spring, leading to an incorrect integral. After corrections, the work done against one spring is expressed as $$ W_{each_{y}} = 2k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$ and for two springs as $$ W_{both_{y}} = 4k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the spring constant and integrating the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and its application in physics.
  • Knowledge of vector addition and components of forces.
  • Basic principles of elastic potential energy in springs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of work done on springs using calculus.
  • Learn about the implications of series and parallel spring configurations on spring constants.
  • Explore the concept of restoring forces in mechanical systems.
  • Investigate the relationship between elastic potential energy and work done on springs.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in mechanics or spring dynamics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in calculating work done in spring systems.

Ebby
Messages
41
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
How much work must you do to push the midpoint of the string up or down a distance y?
Relevant Equations
F = -kx
W = Fy
spring1.PNG

spring2.PNG

spring4.PNG

My question is whether I've formed the integral for the work done correctly? It just seems a bit unwieldy to me...

If I call the extension of the spring ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##. Combining them gives: $$ x = \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$

Since the restoring force generated by one spring is ## F_{res} = -k \sqrt {y^2 - l} ## along its axis, the force that must be exerted by me to overcome both springs is: $$ F_{me} = 2k \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$

Now, using ## W = \int |\vec F| \, \cos \theta \, |d \vec r| ## where ## cos \theta = \frac {y} {z} = \frac {y} {\frac {l} {2} + x} ## we can say that: $$ W_{me} = 2k \int_a^b \frac {y \sqrt {y^2 - l}} {\frac {l} {2} + \sqrt {y^2 - l}} \, dy $$ $$ = 2k \int_a^b \frac {y} {\frac {l} {2 \sqrt {y^2 - l}} + 1} \, dy $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all your equation ##x = \sqrt {y^2 - l}## is dimensionally incorrect and that error propagates down your derivation. I'm sure that's a typo.
Ebby said:
Since the restoring force generated by one spring is ## F_{res} = -k \sqrt {y^2 - l} ## along its axis, the force that must be exerted by me to overcome both springs is: $$ F_{me} = 2k \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$
Why the doubling? Is this how we add vectors that have the same magnitude but point in different directions?
 
Don't we have to be careful about the spring constant? Imagine two springs of length ##l/2## connected in series. If the full spring length ##l## has a spring constant of ##k##, then each spring of length ##l/2## must have spring constant ##k_{l/2} = ?##

Also…maybe the math of the dot product takes care of it, but I get something less messy by noticing something about the "work" from the horizontal components of the restoring force through the displacement?
 
Last edited:
Ebby said:
My question is whether I've formed the integral for the work done correctly? It just seems a bit unwieldy to me...
If you are allowed to use the standard formula for the elastic potential energy of a spring ##(E = \frac 12 kx^2)##, then part (a) can be done without calculus. Simply consider the total extension.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn and Lnewqban
Yeah I really messed that up. Take two.

I shall replace the single spring with two identical springs, each with a spring constant of ## 2k ##. This is equivalent.

Considering one of the springs, if I call its extension ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##.

Combining gives: $$ x^2 + lx - y^2 = 0 $$ Solving for x: $$ x = \frac {-l \pm \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ I only want the positive solution, so it's: $$ x = \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ Now, the force with which I push against each spring is: $$ F_{each} = 2kx = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}) $$ The force in the ## y ## direction is: $$ F_{each_{y}} = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})\cos\theta $$ $$ = \frac {k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\frac l 2 + \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2}} $$ $$ = \frac {2k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} $$ $$ = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) $$ So the work done pushing against one spring is [EDIT: inserted missing integration symbol]: $$ W_{each_{y}} = 2k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$ And against two springs [EDIT: inserted missing integration symbol]: $$ W_{both_{y}} = 4k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$ Does this integral look right now?
 
Last edited:
Ebby said:
Yeah I really messed that up. Take two.

I shall replace the single spring with two identical springs, each with a spring constant of ## 2k ##. This is equivalent.

Considering one of the springs, if I call its extension ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##.

Combining gives: $$ x^2 + lx - y^2 = 0 $$ Solving for x: $$ x = \frac {-l \pm \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ I only want the positive solution, so it's: $$ x = \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ Now, the force with which I push against each spring is: $$ F_{each} = 2kx = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}) $$ The force in the ## y ## direction is: $$ F_{each_{y}} = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})\cos\theta $$ $$ = \frac {k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\frac l 2 + \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2}} $$ $$ = \frac {2k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} $$ $$ = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) $$ So the work done pushing against one spring is $$ W_{each_{y}} = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) \, dy $$ And against two springs: $$ W_{both_{y}} = 4ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) \, dy $$ Does this integral look right now?
Thats what I got, but the extra algebra trying to use the extension can be avoided:

$$ F_{l/2} = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right)$$

The vertical component of each spring is

$$ F_{y_{l/2}} = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right) \cos \theta = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right) \frac{y}{z} = k_{l/2} \left( 1 - \frac{l}{2 z}\right) y $$

Then multiply by 2 for each spring contribution:

$$ dW = F_{y_{l/2}}~dy = 2 k_{l/2} \left( 1 - \frac{l}{2 \sqrt{ (l/2)^2 + y^2}}\right) y~dy $$
 
Last edited:
@erobz Yes that's better. (Btw, I know you meant ## \cos\theta ##.)

I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
Ebby said:
@erobz Yes that's better. (Btw, I know you meant ## \cos\theta ##.)

I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
Oh, I chose the opposite angle in my working. Didn’t notice you hadn’t picked that one in your diagram. I’ll fix it.
 
Ebby said:
I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
It does work out, and it is quite efficient in comparison.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and Lnewqban
  • #10
erobz said:
It does work out, and it is quite efficient in comparison.
Yep I did it. Much more efficient.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
988
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K