Work done pushing a spring from the side

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done when pushing a spring from the side, focusing on the mechanics of spring forces and integration methods. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically related to springs and work-energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the formulation of integrals for work done, questioning the correctness of equations and dimensional consistency. There is discussion on the implications of using two springs versus one, and how to properly account for forces in different directions. Some participants suggest alternative methods to simplify the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's equations and reasoning. Some have offered guidance on using the elastic potential energy formula as an alternative approach. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being examined, particularly regarding the setup and assumptions about the spring constants.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential typos and dimensional errors in the original equations. Participants are also considering the effects of using springs in series and the implications for the spring constants involved. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the problem setup and ensure accurate calculations.

Ebby
Messages
41
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
How much work must you do to push the midpoint of the string up or down a distance y?
Relevant Equations
F = -kx
W = Fy
spring1.PNG

spring2.PNG

spring4.PNG

My question is whether I've formed the integral for the work done correctly? It just seems a bit unwieldy to me...

If I call the extension of the spring ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##. Combining them gives: $$ x = \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$

Since the restoring force generated by one spring is ## F_{res} = -k \sqrt {y^2 - l} ## along its axis, the force that must be exerted by me to overcome both springs is: $$ F_{me} = 2k \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$

Now, using ## W = \int |\vec F| \, \cos \theta \, |d \vec r| ## where ## cos \theta = \frac {y} {z} = \frac {y} {\frac {l} {2} + x} ## we can say that: $$ W_{me} = 2k \int_a^b \frac {y \sqrt {y^2 - l}} {\frac {l} {2} + \sqrt {y^2 - l}} \, dy $$ $$ = 2k \int_a^b \frac {y} {\frac {l} {2 \sqrt {y^2 - l}} + 1} \, dy $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all your equation ##x = \sqrt {y^2 - l}## is dimensionally incorrect and that error propagates down your derivation. I'm sure that's a typo.
Ebby said:
Since the restoring force generated by one spring is ## F_{res} = -k \sqrt {y^2 - l} ## along its axis, the force that must be exerted by me to overcome both springs is: $$ F_{me} = 2k \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$
Why the doubling? Is this how we add vectors that have the same magnitude but point in different directions?
 
Don't we have to be careful about the spring constant? Imagine two springs of length ##l/2## connected in series. If the full spring length ##l## has a spring constant of ##k##, then each spring of length ##l/2## must have spring constant ##k_{l/2} = ?##

Also…maybe the math of the dot product takes care of it, but I get something less messy by noticing something about the "work" from the horizontal components of the restoring force through the displacement?
 
Last edited:
Ebby said:
My question is whether I've formed the integral for the work done correctly? It just seems a bit unwieldy to me...
If you are allowed to use the standard formula for the elastic potential energy of a spring ##(E = \frac 12 kx^2)##, then part (a) can be done without calculus. Simply consider the total extension.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn and Lnewqban
Yeah I really messed that up. Take two.

I shall replace the single spring with two identical springs, each with a spring constant of ## 2k ##. This is equivalent.

Considering one of the springs, if I call its extension ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##.

Combining gives: $$ x^2 + lx - y^2 = 0 $$ Solving for x: $$ x = \frac {-l \pm \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ I only want the positive solution, so it's: $$ x = \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ Now, the force with which I push against each spring is: $$ F_{each} = 2kx = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}) $$ The force in the ## y ## direction is: $$ F_{each_{y}} = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})\cos\theta $$ $$ = \frac {k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\frac l 2 + \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2}} $$ $$ = \frac {2k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} $$ $$ = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) $$ So the work done pushing against one spring is [EDIT: inserted missing integration symbol]: $$ W_{each_{y}} = 2k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$ And against two springs [EDIT: inserted missing integration symbol]: $$ W_{both_{y}} = 4k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$ Does this integral look right now?
 
Last edited:
Ebby said:
Yeah I really messed that up. Take two.

I shall replace the single spring with two identical springs, each with a spring constant of ## 2k ##. This is equivalent.

Considering one of the springs, if I call its extension ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##.

Combining gives: $$ x^2 + lx - y^2 = 0 $$ Solving for x: $$ x = \frac {-l \pm \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ I only want the positive solution, so it's: $$ x = \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ Now, the force with which I push against each spring is: $$ F_{each} = 2kx = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}) $$ The force in the ## y ## direction is: $$ F_{each_{y}} = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})\cos\theta $$ $$ = \frac {k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\frac l 2 + \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2}} $$ $$ = \frac {2k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} $$ $$ = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) $$ So the work done pushing against one spring is $$ W_{each_{y}} = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) \, dy $$ And against two springs: $$ W_{both_{y}} = 4ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) \, dy $$ Does this integral look right now?
Thats what I got, but the extra algebra trying to use the extension can be avoided:

$$ F_{l/2} = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right)$$

The vertical component of each spring is

$$ F_{y_{l/2}} = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right) \cos \theta = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right) \frac{y}{z} = k_{l/2} \left( 1 - \frac{l}{2 z}\right) y $$

Then multiply by 2 for each spring contribution:

$$ dW = F_{y_{l/2}}~dy = 2 k_{l/2} \left( 1 - \frac{l}{2 \sqrt{ (l/2)^2 + y^2}}\right) y~dy $$
 
Last edited:
@erobz Yes that's better. (Btw, I know you meant ## \cos\theta ##.)

I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
Ebby said:
@erobz Yes that's better. (Btw, I know you meant ## \cos\theta ##.)

I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
Oh, I chose the opposite angle in my working. Didn’t notice you hadn’t picked that one in your diagram. I’ll fix it.
 
Ebby said:
I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
It does work out, and it is quite efficient in comparison.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and Lnewqban
  • #10
erobz said:
It does work out, and it is quite efficient in comparison.
Yep I did it. Much more efficient.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K