How Is Work Calculated in Electric Fields?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done in moving a test charge of +1.0x10^-6C from a distance of 100m to 0.4m from a charged sphere of 3.2x10^-3C. The correct approach involves using the formula for electric potential energy, E = k(q1*q2)/r, to find the energies at both distances. The calculated values are E1 = 72J and E2 = 0.288J, leading to a change in energy (delta E) of -179.712J, indicating the work done. The negative value arises from the initial and final positions being mixed up in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy and work in electric fields
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and the constant k (Coulomb's constant)
  • Basic knowledge of charge interactions and units of charge (Coulombs)
  • Ability to perform calculations involving distances in meters
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the derivation of electric potential energy from force integration
  • Study the concept of electric fields and their relation to potential energy
  • Explore the implications of negative work in electric fields
  • Investigate the differences between electric potential and electric potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electric fields and potential energy calculations, as well as educators looking for practical examples in teaching these concepts.

rojasharma
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
a test charge of +1.0x10^-6C is 40cm from a charged sphere of 3.2x10^-3C. A) how much work was required to move it therer from a point 1.0x10^2m away from the sphere? b) how many electrons were gained or lost from the test object to creat the charge?. I tried but i do not get the right answer:(. what i did was..used Ee1=kq1q2/r1 (r1 as 0.4m), Ee2=kq1q2/r2(r2 as 100m), then found delta Ee= Ee2=Ee1, Delta Ee= W??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work is defined as F*ds. Look at the equations you used and the units they give.
 
In the book there is excatly same question except it is moved 100cm instead of 100m. And the answer they got was 43 J. i tired all possible ways...i don;t get the right answer. if i use the above equation, delta Ee=E2-E1, it gives me 43..( but i don;t think that's the right approch here:S)
 
I think you need another equation to solve for this. First, try to find that problem on cramster.com (they have solutions for many problems). We are also learning Electric Fields(physics 11) in my class at the moment.
 
Don;t see that problem in cramster.com:(, thanks for the web though.
 
rojasharma said:
what i did was..used Ee1=kq1q2/r1 (r1 as 0.4m), Ee2=kq1q2/r2(r2 as 100m), then found delta Ee= Ee2=Ee1, Delta Ee= W??
That sounds right. You need to find the change in electric potential energy as the charges are brought together.
 
So,
q1=3.2x10^-3C
q2=1x10^-6C
r1=0.4m
r2=100m

Solution
E1= 72J (E1= (kq1q2)/r1)
E2= 0.288J (E2=kq1q2/r2)

delta E= E2-E1
delta E= 0.288J - 180J
delta E=-179.712J
Delta E= work done...(what about the negative value??)
 
rojasharma said:
So,
q1=3.2x10^-3C
q2=1x10^-6C
r1=0.4m
r2=100m

Solution
E1= 72J (E1= (kq1q2)/r1)
E2= 0.288J (E2=kq1q2/r2)
Looks OK. (You seemed to have switched r1 & r2: the charge moves from 100m to 0.4m.)

delta E= E2-E1
delta E= 0.288J - 180J
delta E=-179.712J
Delta E= work done...(what about the negative value??)
Where did you get 180J from? The negative sign is due to you mixing up initial and final positions.
 
Oh, sorry the E1 is 72J...so its delta E= E1- E2?/ how did i mix up?
 
  • #10
Initial position: r1 = 100 m.
Final position: r2 = 0.4 m.
 
  • #11
right ...silly me...thanks a lot
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
That sounds right. You need to find the change in electric potential energy as the charges are brought together.

hmm. I am thinking of writing the force between the two charges and integrating it over the distance.
 
  • #13
PaintballerCA said:
I am thinking of writing the force between the two charges and integrating it over the distance.
Which is how one would derive the expression for electric potential energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K