MHB Work energy principle and power

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a box sliding down a ramp using the work-energy principle. The height of the ramp is 20 cm, and the box starts from rest, allowing for the application of conservation of energy. The gravitational potential energy (GPE) at the top is converted into kinetic energy (KE) at the bottom, leading to the equation 1/2mv^2 = mgh. By substituting the values for g and h, the mass cancels out, simplifying the calculation. The final speed of the box at the bottom of the ramp is determined to be 2 m/s.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A box slides down a smooth ramp. The height of the ramp is 20cm and the length of the ramp is 2.5m. The box starts from rest. What is the speed of the box when it reaches the bottom of the ramp?
I don't understand how to solve this. Pls help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We can apply conservation of energy.

What is the energy due to gravity at the beginning?
What is the kinetic energy at the end?
 
Increase in KE= loss of GPE
1/2mv^2= mgh
So gpe at the top = m×10× 0.2
GPE at the bottom = 0J
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
We can apply conservation of energy.

What is the energy due to gravity at the beginning?
What is the kinetic energy at the end?
I don't understand how to solve this. Pls help
 
You have the correct equation.
Fill in g and h.
And we can cancel m from both sides.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
You have the correct equation.
Fill in g and h.
And we can cancel m from both sides.
h=0.2m, so v= 2m/s. I was getting confused with the length of the ramp.
Thanks a lottt!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
866
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
377
Back
Top