Work Energy Theorem in Spring Block System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Work-Energy Theorem in a vertical spring-block system undergoing Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) with gravity as the only external force. It is established that when applying the theorem, one should consider the net force, which includes both the spring force and gravitational force, and the corresponding net potential energy, represented as ##{1\over 2} kx^2##. The consensus is that analyzing the system from the relaxed length of the spring simplifies calculations compared to starting from the equilibrium position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM)
  • Familiarity with the Work-Energy Theorem
  • Knowledge of spring force and potential energy equations
  • Basic concepts of gravitational force in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Work-Energy Theorem in mechanical systems
  • Explore the implications of net force in SHM scenarios
  • Learn about potential energy calculations in spring systems
  • Investigate examples of vertical spring-block systems in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of spring-block systems and the application of the Work-Energy Theorem.

SDewan
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Just got confused that while applying the Work - Energy Theorem in a vertical Spring-Block system performing SHM (considering no other external forces other than gravity), when I apply the theorem from equilibrium position, do I consider the work done by gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello SD, :welcome:

In principle: yes.
In exercises it's often easier to work with the net force (i.e. the vector sum of the spring force and the gravitational force) and the associated net potential energy ##{1\over 2} kx^2## where ##x## is the extension minus the equilibrium extension.

If you want this clearer, you may want to provide a complete problem statement for the exercise that confused you.
 
Yea I understood that it will be better to apply the W-E Principle from the relaxed length of the spring, rather than the equilibrium position.
I feel that it is simpler to take all forces into consideration. i.e. gravity, spring force and the kinetic energy.
I have got the clarity, thanks a ton!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K