Work energy thm and conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between work, kinetic energy, and conservative forces. It highlights that the change in kinetic energy (K2-K1) equals the integral of force along a path (∫F.dr), but this equality holds true for conservative forces only. For non-conservative forces, both the work done and the change in kinetic energy depend on the path taken. The confusion arises from the interpretation of path independence, which is only applicable when dealing with conservative forces. Ultimately, as long as the net force is considered, the integral of force will always equal the change in kinetic energy.
rattan5
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Since the change of kinetic energy, K2-K1, ALWAYS equals the integral of F.dr along any path, how can that integral depend upon the path? I realize that the integral is ONLY equal to the change in potential energy (F is the derivative of the potential) at the end points when F is a conservative force. But the integral always equals the same value K2-K1, regardless of the path from 1 to 2. Isn't that what is meant by independence of path?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just because ∫F.dr equals K2-K1 (when F is the net force) doesn't mean that it's path independent. For non-conservative forces, both ∫F.dr and K2-K1 depend on the path.
 
Since KE depends only on the magnitude of the vector, any path I take having the same starting and ending velocities will of course have the same work.
 
rattan5 said:
Since KE depends only on the magnitude of the vector, any path I take having the same starting and ending velocities will of course have the same work.
Well, that's certainly true. But not all paths will have the same starting and ending velocities.
 
Thanks for your replies. My confusion I think lies with the derivation I watched from a Yale video which went like (please notice dot product and vectors)

K = mv.v/2
dK/dt = m dv/dt.v
dK = ma.v = ma.dr/dt so
∫dK = ∫F.dr and then the lhs was set to K2-K1 to get
K2-K1 = ∫F.dr

From what you're saying, which must be true, the last step is only true for conservative forces.
 
rattan5 said:
From what you're saying, which must be true, the last step is only true for conservative forces.
No. As long as F is the only force acting, ∫F.dr will always equal ΔKE.

(If F is a conservative force, then ∫F.dr will be independent of the particular path chosen between the given endpoints.)
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top