Work function and energy of X ray photon emitted by anode

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the energy of X-ray photons emitted by anodes and the role of the work function in this process. There is confusion about whether the energy of the emitted photon should be calculated as E=hf plus or minus the work function. It is suggested that if the electron has initial kinetic energy, the emitted photon might have energy E=hf minus the work function. The participants question the relevance of the work function when the electron is boiled off and whether it applies at the anode. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of photon energy calculations in relation to the work function and the conditions of electron emission.
SecretSnow
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm constantly bothered by one assumption in my textbook..it says that the photon emitted by the accelerating electron boiled off from the cathode colliding into the anode, has E=hf neglecting the work function, since its negligible. I'm curious whether it's E=hf plus or minus the work function, and I'm really confused by this. Firstly, if I work backwards, like imagining it's a photon liberating the electron through the photoelectric effect instead, then the energy released should be E=hf + work function right? Since it emits the work function energy of the electron together with the photon right? However, how do we know they are separate values, since the work function energy can itself be incorporated into the hf value of the photon? Wouldn't it be the same then?

Next, I think it's E=hf - the work function since if the accelerated electron has an initiall KE of E=eV=hf-work function then wouldn't the emitted photon have energy E=hf -phi too? Hmm but I think this whole second paragraph is invalid since the electron is initially boiled off by heating right? I'm not sure...I hope you guys can help me clear my confusion! Although the reason is not really needed, I'm curious to find out, thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial electron cannot have a negative energy at the cathode - it starts with at least zero (and the required energy to exit the material is thermal energy), and has at least eV at the time it hits the anode. If the electron directly gets captured in the anode, hf=E=eV+work function might be possible as photon energy.
 
Actually I don't get why the textbook even mentions work function in the first place. if the electron is boiled off,then initially if should have low or zero KE, which means by the time it reaches the anode, it should have E=eV. The thing is, does the work function applies in the anode? If yes, then I'm assuming after it reaches the anode it goes into the ground state right? (Since it's been decelerated to the lowest energy state possible) during this acceleration, the photon should have E=hf, now, I think, without work function, or it is inside the E=hf equation already. Where then does the work function even apply? Thanks a lot!
 
I'm thinking if it could be the work function of anode it's saying, and that there might be electrons of the anode absorbing the photon produced by the colliding electrons? Is this possible? But if the energy of the photon emitted is high enough, then it should be able to liberate the electrons on the anode with kinetic energy supplied too, so it isn't insignificant is it? It's more like assuming the pathway of the photon doesn't collide with the anode...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top