Work function of conservative forces

AI Thread Summary
The work done by conservative forces is equivalent to potential energy due to the principle of conservation of energy, where an increase in potential energy corresponds to a decrease in kinetic energy. The relationship between work and potential energy is expressed mathematically, emphasizing equality rather than equivalence. The discussion clarifies that the variation of potential energy can be equal to the work function, but not necessarily its variation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for studying escleronomic systems subjected to conservative forces. The connection between electron removal and potential energy variation remains a point of inquiry.
Eduardo Ascenso
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could anyone help me with the following questions?

- Why is the work done by conservative forces equivalent to the potential energy?
- Why is the variation of the potential energy in such cases equals to the variation of the work function?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework question? You should ask this question in the appropriate forum then.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
The answer is conservation of energy. Whenever potential energy increases with force, a change in other types of energy must occur to balance everything out. The amount that potential energy increases is the same as the amount the kinetic energy increase.
 
Thank you for your reply. This is not a homework. I'm studying the conservation of energy in escleronomic systems subjected to conservative forces. All the books I've read only said that in such cases we have "-dV = dU", but they don't give any explanation about it. Searching a little bit, I saw that work function is the minimum energy necessary to remove an electron from the surface of a solid into the vacuum. What I didn't get is what's the relation between the removal of electrons and the variation of potential energy.
 
Eduardo Ascenso said:
Could anyone help me with the following questions?

- Why is the work done by conservative forces equivalent to the potential energy?
- Why is the variation of the potential energy in such cases equals to the variation of the work function?

Thanks!
Look at the definition of potential energy. How is the potential energy defined, mathematically?
And is not equivalence but equality, with the right sign.

The second part is not correct. The variation of potential energy may be equal to the work function (not its variation).
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top