Work out the variance of the gamma

gerv13
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm trying to work out the variance of the gamma(I'm up the the part where you multiply x^2 by the function), but i don't know how to work out what

\gamma(\alpha + 2) equals to

i know I am supposed to use the fact that \gamma(\alpha + 1) = \alpha \gamma(\alpha)

but i don't understand what to do, please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's not clear whether you are talking about the gamma probability distribution or the gamma function. The gamma function has the property that \Gamma(\alpha+1)= \alpha\Gamma(\alpha) but is normally represented by the capital \Gamma, not \gamma.

In any case, \Gamma(\alpha+ 2)= \Gamma(\alpha+1+ 1)= (\alpha+1)\Gamma(\alpha+1)= (\alpha+ 1)\alpha\Gamma(\alpha).
 


HallsofIvy said:
It's not clear whether you are talking about the gamma probability distribution or the gamma function.

gerv13 said:
Hi, I'm trying to work out the variance of the gamma

I'm not sure either, but I have to guess its the probability distribution.
 


yupp i actually meant \Gamma sorry about that. but thanks for the help
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top