Work problem, box moves at h=.25 with F=85N

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work done on a 3.0 kg shoe box being pushed up a frictionless ramp at a constant speed by a force of 85.0 N at an angle of 55.0 degrees. The correct calculation of work involves using the formula Work = mgh, resulting in a positive value of +7.35 J, despite the gravitational force acting in the opposite direction. Participants clarify that while gravitational work is negative, the applied force's work is positive due to the displacement direction, leading to confusion about the signs in the work equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of work and energy
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Basic understanding of trigonometry, specifically sine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of work-energy principle in physics
  • Learn about vector decomposition in force analysis
  • Explore the implications of frictionless surfaces in mechanics
  • Investigate the role of angles in force applications and their effects on motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of work calculations involving forces and angles.

edgarpokemon
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A constant force Fa of magnitude 85.0N is applied to a 3.0kg shoe box at angle 55.0, causing the box to move up a frictionless ramp at constant speed. How much work is done on the box by Fa when the box has moved through vertical distance h=.25m?

Homework Equations


mgsin(angle)-Fa=0(constant speed)
mgsin(55)=Fa=24.08N
hyp=opp/sin(55)=.305m
Work=+7.35J (problably minus because the work is pointing down and displacement is up)
mgh=-7.35J

The Attempt at a Solution


So I know that the simple way is just to use mgh. But in my homework the the box is going up, so I assume that the gravity will do negative work. But the answer is positive and they used mgh. They used Wa=-Wg and they they switched the -Wg to +Wg, and i am not sure why they did that. So was what I did correct too?
 

Attachments

  • mmm.gif
    mmm.gif
    2.5 KB · Views: 525
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Ed,

I don't see ##m\vec g\sin\theta## and ##\vec F_a## pointing in the same direction ? I agree that the component of ##\vec F_a## along the incline should be 24.1 Newton (my ##|\vec g| = 9.81## m/s2). And if ##\vec F_a## does no work perpendicular to the incline (there is no displacement in that direction), but only along the incline, over the given distance, I get a different result !

[edit] I suspect this exercise is a lot more involved then you (and I at first) think. Where in the drawing is the ##55 \ ^\circ## ? Is ##\phi = 55^\circ##. In that case: check: "frictionless" and "at constant speed" !
[edit2] suspicion relieved, see below o:) . And I don't get a different answer any more . But ##Fa## is an unknown.
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
[edit] I suspect this exercise is a lot more involved then you (and I at first) think.
I would suggest it is rather less involved than it appears. The trick is to realize what information is irrelevant.
Ed, think of it from the perspective of the box and its overall change of state.
 
Frictionless and the angle of the incline is not given !
 
BvU said:
Frictionless and the angle of the incline is not given !
Is that in response to my post? If so, what point are you making?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K