Work problem, physics solution

AI Thread Summary
A nursery in California faces challenges planting heavy trees in 36" boxes weighing up to 1700 lbs, especially when customers have retainer walls and refuse crane services. The planting crew currently hand lifts these boxes, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. A pulley system is proposed as a potential solution to streamline the process and reduce costs. Suggestions include considering Griphoist or Tirfor winches, though finding a suitable ground anchor remains a concern. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of renting a crane versus providing free manpower is also recommended.
zheiland
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I work at a nursery in California where we go out and plant the trees that we sell. Some of these trees are in 36" boxes and weigh up to 1700 lbs. Many times customers have 3-5 feet retainer walls and don't want to pay for a crane, and the planting crew is forced to hand lift these boxes inch by inch along a make shift ramp. I figured it would save a lot of time and money if we just built our own pulley system. Any suggestions on schematics or possible solutions to the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So at the moment you give your customers the extra manpower and time required to build ramps free of charge. Have you worked out if it's cheaper for you to buy a crane and give them a free crane rental instead of free manpower?

Perhaps look at a Griphoist or Tirfor winches? The problem might be finding a suitable ground anchor to fix the other end to.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top