Work Required to Stretch Spring 4-7 ft: 8.4 ft-lbs

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work required to stretch a spring from a specified length, with a focus on the relationship between force and distance in the context of Hooke's Law.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limits of integration used in the calculation, with some questioning the starting point of the stretch. There is an exploration of the interpretation of the problem statement regarding the natural length of the spring and the distances involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants clarifying their understanding of the problem setup. Some guidance has been provided regarding the interpretation of the limits of integration, but no consensus has been reached on the numerical aspects of the solution.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity in the wording of the problem, leading to different interpretations of the limits for the work calculation. Participants are addressing this ambiguity in their responses.

blessedcurse
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The amount of WORK to stretch a spring 4 feet beyond its natural length of 2 feet is 10 ft-lbs. Find the work required to stretch the spring from 4 feet to 7 feet.

Homework Equations



W=\int^{b}_{a}Fdx=\int^{b}_{a}kxdx=[kx^{2}/2]^{b}_{a}

The Attempt at a Solution



10=[kx^{2}/2]^{4}_{0}
10=k(16)/2-k(0)/2
10=8k
k=4/5

W=[kx^{2}/2]^{b}_{a}
W=4/5[x^{2}/2]^{5}_{2}
W=4(25)/10-4(4)/10
W=42/5

W=8.4 ft*lb
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you explain your limits of integration? The spring is either being stretched from 0 to 6 ft or from 2 to 6 ft, I don't see where you got 0 to 4 from.
 
It's being stretched 4 feet beyond its natural length of 2 feet, so the natural length is the 0 and then 4 feet beyond that is 4.

At first I had 2 to 6, but then I realized that that meant stretching it from 2 feet beyond its natural length to 6 feet beyond it because the limits refer to change in distance... so the change in distance is 0 to 4.
 
Oh, I see. Sorry, that is a badly worded question (or more likely I read it badly). I thought it meant it's being stretched four feet beyond it's elestic limit! My bad.

Given that is true I think your answer is correct, at least in it's principle (Ihaven't checked the numerics).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K