Work to Move parallel capacitor Plates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done to move the plates of a parallel capacitor apart while connected to a constant voltage source. Participants explore different methods of integration and the implications of moving one plate versus both plates simultaneously.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the work done is calculated using the charge and electric field of only one plate, suggesting that both plates could be considered.
  • Another participant notes that the charge Q and electric field E are not constant as the distance changes, raising concerns about the integration setup.
  • There is a proposal to change the variable of integration to account for moving both plates, suggesting a relationship between the distance and the position of each plate.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of multiplying the result by two when considering both plates, with one questioning if it's possible to calculate the total work without this multiplication.
  • It is suggested that one could perform the integration separately for each plate, which leads to the same result as multiplying by two.
  • Symmetry in the forces and movements of the plates is mentioned as a reason to simplify the calculation by focusing on one plate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the approach to calculating work done, with some advocating for focusing on one plate while others explore the implications of considering both plates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to calculate the total work without multiplying by two.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the charge and electric field are not constant during the movement, which may affect the integration process. There is also a discussion about the relationship between the distance moved and the variable of integration.

Typhon4ever
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi, in my book there are two capacitor plates distance x apart (they are kept connected to a constant voltage source). These plates are moved apart to distance 3x. In order to find the work done to move the capacitors apart (using W=F dl=QE dl), my book takes the charge Q of one plate and electric field felt on that one plate and integrates it from x to 3x. Why can't we take the take the charge and electric field felt on both plates and integrate half the distance of x to 3x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Typhon4ever said:
In order to find the work done to move the capacitors apart (using W=F dl=QE dl), my book takes the charge Q of one plate and electric field felt on that one plate and integrates it from x to 3x.
OK, but Q and E are not constant as the distance changes.

Why can't we take the take the charge and electric field felt on both plates and integrate half the distance of x to 3x?
Who says you can't?
 
Doc Al said:
OK, but Q and E are not constant as the distance changes.


Who says you can't?

Okay, how would I set up the integration of both plates? My book says the Q on one plate is [itex]\frac{\epsilon_0 A V}{L}[/itex] and the electric field felt on that one plate is [itex]\frac{V}{2L}[/itex] how would I change these to be both plates?
 
Typhon4ever said:
Okay, how would I set up the integration of both plates? My book says the Q on one plate is [itex]\frac{\epsilon_0 A V}{L}[/itex] and the electric field felt on that one plate is [itex]\frac{V}{2L}[/itex] how would I change these to be both plates?
The only thing that would change would be your variable of integration. Since you want to move each plate half the distance, for each plate the position y would relate to the distance between them by L = 2y. Then just integrate from y = x/2 to y = 3x/2. You'll need to multiply your answer by 2, of course.

Compare that to just moving one plate (like in your book). In that case y would be the total distance, so L = y. And you'd integrate from y = x to y = 3x. (And not multiply by 2.)

Each method should give the same answer for the work done.
 
Doc Al said:
The only thing that would change would be your variable of integration. Since you want to move each plate half the distance, for each plate the position y would relate to the distance between them by L = 2y. Then just integrate from y = x/2 to y = 3x/2. You'll need to multiply your answer by 2, of course.

Compare that to just moving one plate (like in your book). In that case y would be the total distance, so L = y. And you'd integrate from y = x to y = 3x. (And not multiply by 2.)

Each method should give the same answer for the work done.

Oh, I see. You have to focus on one plate. There is no possible way to calculate work done on both plates at once? Is that because the Q between them both is 0?
 
Typhon4ever said:
Oh, I see. You have to focus on one plate. There is no possible way to calculate work done on both plates at once?
I'm not sure what you mean. You are calculating the work done on both plates--it's the same on both so that's why you multiply by 2.
 
Doc Al said:
I'm not sure what you mean. You are calculating the work done on both plates--it's the same on both so that's why you multiply by 2.

What I meant is that is there a way to calculate the total work done without multiplying by two? Or can we only calculate the work on one plate and have to double it.
 
Typhon4ever said:
What I meant is that is there a way to calculate the total work done without multiplying by two? Or can we only calculate the work on one plate and have to double it.
Well, you can always do the integration twice! Once for each side.
 
Doc Al said:
Well, you can always do the integration twice! Once for each side.

Isn't that the same thing as multiplying by 2?
 
  • #10
Typhon4ever said:
Isn't that the same thing as multiplying by 2?
Yep. :wink:

But since the two plates experience the same force and movement, why not take advantage of symmetry?
 
  • #11
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K