Working out Plane Structure via Powder X-ray Diffraction Multiplicand

PandaKitten
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I need to work out the structure of NaCl using its Debye rings diameter and the equation below by working out its multiplicand and then assigning the appropriate plane structure to it.
Relevant Equations
(h^2+k^2+l^2)_min * (sin^2(theta_n))/(sin^2(theta_min)) = integer
Below is the measured values for the Debye rings I obtained. I have to multiply the ratio (which is (sin^2(theta_n))/(sin^2(theta_min))) by a multiplicand until I get an integer. However for the multiplicand and the values I measured I get 1, 3, 13, ??, 4, 8, ??. These should either correspond to a cubic structure (1,2,3,4,5...) a body centric structure (2,4,8,10..) or a face centric structure (3,4,8,11,12,16) but they don't correspond to any of them and also they should be in ascending size.
XRD.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what the distance to the screen is, so we can check your calculations?

It's important to be careful to note that the radius of the Debye-Scherrer ring corresponds to an angle of ##2\theta## (and likewise the diameter of the Debye-Scherrer ring corresponds to an angle of ##4 \theta##), if ##\theta## is the scattering angle. Did you take that into account?

Assuming you didn't make a mistake, the first four results at least are approximately in the ratio ##3:4:8:11## which is indeed what you'd expect from FCC, for the ##(111)##, ##(200)##, ##(220)## and ##(311)## planes respectively.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
etotheipi said:
Do you know what the distance to the screen is, so we can check your calculations?

It's important to be careful to note that the radius of the Debye-Scherrer ring corresponds to an angle of ##2\theta## (and likewise the diameter of the Debye-Scherrer ring corresponds to an angle of ##4 \theta##), if ##\theta## is the scattering angle. Did you take that into account?

Assuming you didn't make a mistake, the first four results at least are approximately in the ratio ##3:4:8:11## which is indeed what you'd expect from FCC, for the ##(111)##, ##(200)##, ##(220)## and ##(311)## planes respectively.
32.5mm
XRD2.png
 
Your work so far looks correct in that case. Here's what I think, denoting ##N:= h^2 + k^2 + l^2##:

1618683882871.png


It's quite possible that the (311) & (222) peaks, and similarly the (311) & (420) peaks, were so close together that they just appear as a single ring each.

Nonetheless, your results can definitely be matched onto the FCC structure!
 
Oh I see! I was given this equation that wasn't very well explained. So I assumed that the integer wasn't important and I should multiply them all by different multiplicands. But now I understand. Thank you so much.
XRD3.png
 
Yeah, the key is that ##\sin^2{(\theta)} / N## is a constant, so the ratio of the ##\sin^2{\theta}##'s of any two rows is the same as the ratio of the ##N = h^2 + k^2 + l^2##'s of those two rows.

So in that sense, your table is a little misleading, because all the multiplicands are of course the same - in this case ##3## - and this multiplication only serves to display the ratios as nice whole numbers. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top