Working w/ Complex representation E-field

AI Thread Summary
A time-varying electric field is often expressed in complex format, such as E(t) = E_o e^{iωt}·k. To calculate the potential from this complex representation, it is not necessary to convert it to a real format first, as the gradient operation is spatial and can be applied directly to the complex expression. The relationship between the electric field and potential remains valid, with the E-field being the negative gradient of the potential. Using complex notation simplifies calculations and leads to correct results, even when time-dependent factors are involved. Therefore, complex representations can be effectively utilized in electromagnetic calculations.
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Often a time varying E-field is represented in complex format. I have a simple E-field (uniform in space) given by

\vec{E}(t)=E_o\cos(\omega t)\cdot\hat{k}
or equivalently, the real part of

\vec{E}(t)=E_o e^{\omega t}\cdot\hat{k}.

We know the potential is the negative gradient of the E-field.
If we want to calculate the potential of a field represented in the complex notation, do we need first convert to the "real" representation of and then take the gradient?

In other words how do we deal with all the calculations when the field is represented in the complex format.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apteronotus said:
We know the potential is the negative gradient of the E-field.

You have this the wrong way round. The E-field component in a particular direction is minus the gradient in that direction of the potential.

The answer to your question – suitably modified! – is that eiwt can be left in unmodified. It is a time-dependent factor; the gradient operation is a spatial one.
 
Even when you come across time operators, such as in Maxwell's equations, you can stick with complex notation. The imaginary numbers behave very nicely and you still get the right answer in the end.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top