Would a diesel-electric hybrid be better mpg than gas-electric hybrid

  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A diesel-electric hybrid could potentially achieve better fuel economy than a gasoline-electric hybrid due to the efficiency of diesel engines, particularly in a series hybrid configuration where the diesel engine operates at peak efficiency. However, diesel engines are associated with higher emissions of pollutants like nitrogen oxides and particulates, which raises concerns about air quality and health impacts. Advances in biodiesel technology, particularly from algae, may mitigate some CO2 emissions, but diesel still produces other harmful pollutants. The discussion highlights that while diesel hybrids may offer superior mileage, the environmental implications of diesel emissions remain a significant concern. Ultimately, the choice between diesel and gasoline hybrids involves balancing fuel efficiency with environmental impact.
  • #31
Topher925 said:
No he isn't. Model engines are not compression ignition engines and rely on a glow plug for ignition. Ignition of the methanol vapor occurs because it reacts with platinum (or a similar catalyst) in the glow plug coil causing it to ignite. It is not ignited by compression, although greater pressure does aid in the rate of the reaction.

Learn something new every day!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #33
mgb_phys said:
Anyone know what the delay is on these?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogeneous_charge_compression_ignition

GM just announced a prototype of one and said it may be in production in 10years.

One of my professors works on this stuff at GM told me that the biggest problem is control. In short, HCCI is just a very very complicated task to accomplish due to the complexity of controlling valves, timing, ignition, fuel injection ,etc. To use it for anything beyond light loads is an extremely difficult task to accomplish.
 
  • #34
Topher925 said:
One of my professors works on this stuff at GM told me that the biggest problem is control. In short, HCCI is just a very very complicated task to accomplish due to the complexity of controlling valves, timing, ignition, fuel injection ,etc. To use it for anything beyond light loads is an extremely difficult task to accomplish.
Interesting. Those are the kinds of problems that pay off big when a solution is found: complex control solution that raises the bar, but minimal materials for construction in production.
 
  • #35
Topher925 said:
One of my professors works on this stuff at GM told me that the biggest problem is control. ... complexity of controlling valves, timing, ignition, fuel injection ,etc.
A modern engine is already a pretty complex system, I don't see this adds much.
I can see that GM probably doesn't want to launch a diesel in the US but Merc and VW had prototypes 3-4 years ago.
Interestingly Merc see it as a way of upping the MPG and reducing the CO2 of their big sedans so they don't get slammed by higher taxes in europe. So it might be that you don't want to do too much too soon since the regulatory limits will just chase you down.

VW are very happy selling small turbo diesels (more than 50% of new small cars in europe are oil burners - and a big chunk of them are VW) they see the future of this technology that it can burn pretty much anything without modification. That obviously saves them tooling between different markets but I don't think individual consumers are going to switch between ethanol, biodeisel, vegatable oil at the pumps from day-day.
 
  • #36
mgb_phys said:
A modern engine is already a pretty complex system, I don't see this adds much.

You can't even compare the complexity of a regular modern engine to that of an HCCI engine the complexity is so great. With modern engines you really only need to control spark timing, fuel flow, and throttle, along with some ancillary devices like cooling. With HCCI, you need to control EVERYTHING. Its not like a regular engine where you have fixed valve timing. The valves need to be controlled independently and with a very high degree of accuracy which means high speed/pressure hydraulics instead of cam shafts. Temperature sensors and pressure transducers are required all over the place and not to mention the computer hardware to run all this.
 
  • #37
mgb_phys said:
A modern engine is already a pretty complex system, I don't see this adds much.
I can see that GM probably doesn't want to launch a diesel in the US but Merc and VW had prototypes 3-4 years ago.
Interestingly Merc see it as a way of upping the MPG and reducing the CO2 of their big sedans so they don't get slammed by higher taxes in europe. So it might be that you don't want to do too much too soon since the regulatory limits will just chase you down.

VW are very happy selling small turbo diesels (more than 50% of new small cars in europe are oil burners - and a big chunk of them are VW) they see the future of this technology that it can burn pretty much anything without modification. That obviously saves them tooling between different markets but I don't think individual consumers are going to switch between ethanol, biodeisel, vegatable oil at the pumps from day-day.

HCCI isn't a diesel per se (although I think you may be able to use diesel in them). And the control system for HCCI isn't even in the same league as any current engine.

HCCI is putting requirements for control on things that currently we can't. E.g. Exact cylinder temperature on a cycle by cycle basis. The bold bit is what makes this such a task.

It can (and will) be done, it just needs two things time and money.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K