Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Would artificial intelligence and singularity mean the end of humanity?

  1. Sep 3, 2011 #1
    If you haven't seen the TIME article:

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2048299,00.html

    So what exactly would happen if AI became more intelligent than any human that could ever exist? What would stop such a machine from creating another machine more intelligent than itself ad infinitum? Would such a machine even want to compete with humans for resources? Should we even be messing around with this of thing? If we could combine our consciousness with a super computer would it make us immortal and virtually make religion dead since death would be pretty much cured?

    It may sound like science fiction, but experts like Kurtzweil see it as a reality that's about to happen in 30 years. Why would humans even want to introduce something in existence that would be more evolutionarily superior than themselves?
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2011
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 3, 2011 #2

    Ryan_m_b

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Ray Kurtzweil is not an expert. He has no knowledge of any of the subjects he speaks on, especially biology! This conversation is a non-starter for me, it might as well be a discussion on religion.

    Also trying to second guess the motives of an intelligence that does not even exist yet is a pointless exercise, especially if you add the quasi-religious ideology that these AIs will be Gods and that beyond the singularity nothing can be predicted.
     
  4. Sep 3, 2011 #3
    Ok well let's ask 2 questions here:

    1.) is AI possible?

    2.) could AI (if it is possible) become smarter than any human?


    If the possibility exists that the answer is yes to those two questions, then I don't see what would stop such a machine from creating another machine or intelligence that is smarter than itself.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2011
  5. Sep 3, 2011 #4

    Ryan_m_b

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I would say that the fact intelligence is possible is enough. Whether or not we could create a digital version, on demand whilst avoiding the ethical problems is another (and for the moment irrelevant) matter.

    EDIT: Also we keep using the term "intelligence" but that's not what we are talking about is it? We want an Artificial General Intelligence AKA Strong AI. Therefore it has to not only be intelligent but sentient, adaptable and possibly conscious.
    Most likely if only because it has the advantage of perfect memory, easy reprogramming and potentially faster running.

    EDIT2: It also has the advantage that you could spend hundreds of thousands of Euros/Pounds/Dollars etc training it to get multiple degrees and PhDs in a subject and then you could just copy and paste it on command.
    Perhaps there are limits we are unaware of. Perhaps trying to adjust too much causes some sort of insanity. However I stick to the point I said above; trying to second guess the motives of an intelligent entity that does not exist yet is pointless.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2011
  6. Sep 26, 2011 #5
    A machine that is more intelligent than humans does not imply that it is self-aware or has free will.

    Skippy
     
  7. Sep 26, 2011 #6

    Ryan_m_b

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    This is very, very true. Though if I could I would swap the term "intelligent" with "capable". It's entirely conceivable that we could create software capable of highly intelligent activity that doesn't require any sort of general intelligence/sapience.
     
  8. Sep 26, 2011 #7

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    ....and there's also the opposable thumbs thing.
     
  9. Sep 26, 2011 #8
    I don't see a problem with the strong AI (lets suppose one day there is such thing), if its more adaptive than the humans, then its quite normal to come the end of homo sapiens. If you think, if we stop aging, we won't need strong AI for such a process, every next generation will at some point be the end for the previous. That's how things happen, show must go on. And who said we are not intelligent design ourselves?
     
  10. Sep 26, 2011 #9

    Ryan_m_b

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Not to mention the water thing. Always keep a bucket of water next to your bed in case of robot uprising.
     
  11. Sep 26, 2011 #10
    Good post, my main problem with Kurtzweil is that not only he promotes such ideas but he insists they will happen in some few decades.
    Anybody with any knowledge in things like AI, Biology or Nanotechnology knows we are not close to building anything he says. Like an army of nanobots that will fix everything, or that just improving computing power equals artificial intelligence(like, is my computer more intelligent than my calculator?).
    And then he will say it's because of exponential growth and we humans cannot understand it.
     
  12. Sep 26, 2011 #11

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I'd be more concerned about natural stupidity.
     
  13. Sep 26, 2011 #12
    Then I wouldn't call such a machine intelligent, just call it a better adding machine. Even if you could add 100,000,000,000,000,000,000x as many numbers in a second as humans in a minute, unless you have some sort of ability of original thought - which no computer has the rudiments of - you are not truly "intelligent."
     
  14. Sep 26, 2011 #13
    AI is a fancy name for decision making based on preprogramed conditions.
    Computer can't be intelligent they only execute algorithms...
     
  15. Sep 26, 2011 #14

    AlephZero

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    If you claim that is the definition of "intelligence", then prove to me that you don't only execute algorithms.
     
  16. Sep 26, 2011 #15
    I never claimed that this is the "definition" for intelligence, I just pointed out 1 ingredient of it. [I don't posses the full definition =)]
    However, I can prove that I don't follow algorithm:

    Suppose I'm executing an algorithm.
    When I see code of a computer program and look at a "while\if or combination of the two" loop I'm able to tell if the loop is infinity or not. This problem I just described is called "Halting Problem" however Alan Turing proved in 1936 that a general algorithm to solve the halting problem for all possible program-input pairs cannot exist.
    Thus initial assumption is wrong, what in turn means I don't execute algorithm.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2011
  17. Sep 26, 2011 #16
    What makes you so sure it hasn't already happened??? heh :)

    Also stupid robots programmed to do harm are more likely to be what does humanity in then super smart ones. I mean just look at the drone planes the military has one person can probably fly like 20 of them at a time for all I know.
     
  18. Sep 27, 2011 #17
    there is more than one way to fight fires. i'll be carrying an axe.
     
  19. Dec 12, 2011 #18
    I was looking up AI and my mind began to wonder. Assuming that a future computer/AI has an incredible amount of storage and computational speed as well as algorithms that will allow it to manipulate information in every possible way. This computer would be tied in to a network that would record all human activity and interface electronically with humans, my question is would time travel be doable at that point? Would anyone willing to travel back in time just plug in? Would there be a program running that forbids changing the past? At this point I start thinking that maybe we are a simulation after all. Where is the guy with the red and blue pills?
     
  20. Dec 12, 2011 #19

    Ryan_m_b

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    (Emphasis mine)

    You've lost me. How would strong AI observing everything happening lead to time travel?
     
  21. Dec 12, 2011 #20
    at some point in modern history, sci-fi writers had far outpaced the real pace of technology development with their writings and wishful thinkings, there are more fantasy elements than science.

    keep on dreaming
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Would artificial intelligence and singularity mean the end of humanity?
  1. Artificial intelligence (Replies: 16)

  2. Artificial intelligence. (Replies: 32)

Loading...