Would I be able to see a ball passing next to me at 340m/s ?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gen66
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the visibility of a football (soccer ball) passing at high speeds, specifically 340 meters per second and 65 kilometers per second. Participants explore the conditions under which one might see the ball, considering factors such as speed, contrast with the background, and human visual perception.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that at 340 m/s, one might see the ball if focused on the right spot, while at 65 km/s, visibility is unlikely.
  • Others argue that visibility depends on the contrast of the ball with its background and the observer's attentiveness.
  • A participant raises the question of whether a ball moving at 65 km/s could be seen, comparing it to the visibility of bullets, which are typically not seen unless they have a tracer effect.
  • It is noted that a ball traveling at 340 m/s would take approximately 29 milliseconds to pass through a 10-meter field of view, which may be too quick for the human eye to register due to the persistence of vision.
  • Some participants mention practical experiences, such as using a ping pong ball cannon, to illustrate visibility challenges at high speeds.
  • There is a discussion about the role of lighting conditions, with suggestions that a strong light source could potentially make a fast-moving ball visible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a ball at 340 m/s could be seen, with some believing it might be possible under certain conditions, while others are more skeptical. There is general consensus that a ball at 65 km/s would not be seen. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions that would allow visibility at 340 m/s.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on visual acuity, environmental factors such as lighting and background contrast, and the subjective nature of human perception. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or physical implications of visibility at these speeds.

gen66
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Imagine a football(soccer) ball passing next to you with a speed of 340 meters per second. Would you be able to see that? I would like to ignore realistic details as the ball burning or leaving trails etc. I'm just interested if I would be able to see the actual ball passing next to me at that speed? 340m/s is MACH 1 speed.
What about 40 miles per second (65km/s)? Would I see that ball with such speed? (40mph/s is a meteor speed).

Thank you guys! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
gen66 said:
Would you be able to see that?
If you look along the path, 340m/s is not that fast and you would see it coming. At 65km/s, maybe a glowing ball in the dark, if you don't' blink in the wrong moment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gen66
A.T. said:
If you look along the path, 340m/s is not that fast and you would see it coming. At 65km/s, maybe a glowing ball in the dark, if you don't' blink in the wrong moment.

But what if I just have a visual in the space limits of 10 meters width in from of me and I'm focused there, when the ball passes through those meters would I see it? (I don't want to see it coming from 1-2 km away, I want to see it exactly when it passes in front of me if I keep my eyes focused there ) , same valid for the 65km/s ?
 
gen66 said:
But what if I just have a visual in the space limits of 10 meters width in from of me and I'm focused there, when the ball passes through those meters would I see it?
Depends on the contrast the ball has with the background and on how attentive you are. This is more of a biology question, than a physics question.
 
A.T. said:
Depends on the contrast the ball has with the background and on how attentive you are. This is more of a biology question, than a physics question.

Ok, white ball on a dark background space the ball is going to pass like 1 meter away from me, in front of my eyes, I'm attentive as an average 30 year old person from Europe. Do you think it's possible to spot this ball with 65km/s moving speed? I think it's quite a physics question, because I think the speed is extremely high, so I'm just thinking if the object can is moving so fast may be your eyes can't even see that... But actually we can't see bullets can we? And bullets travel 1km/s , I"m asking for a ball with 65km/s hahahahaha, I just answered my own question. Of course we won't be able to see that, so the question is just valid for the 340m/s.
 
Last edited:
gen66 said:
But actually we can't see bullets can we?
With enough contrast, like tracer fire at night, we do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gen66
gen66 said:
But what if I just have a visual in the space limits of 10 meters width in from of me and I'm focused there, when the ball passes through those meters would I see it? (I don't want to see it coming from 1-2 km away, I want to see it exactly when it passes in front of me if I keep my eyes focused there ) , same valid for the 65km/s ?
In a 10 meter field of view, the ball traveling at 340 m/s would take 29 milliseconds to pass by.

According to Wiki: Observers can recall one specific image in an unbroken series of different images, each of which lasts as little as 13 milliseconds.So it may be just possible to spot the 340 m/s ball, but more than likely the persistence of vision will mask it and it will go by unseen, but certainly not unheard!

As for the 65 km/s no way you would see that!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gen66
By the way, 340m/s is about the speed of sound in air. I think whether or not we can see the object depends on its speed as well as its apparent size . We have a good chance seeing a supersonic aircraft, but not a bullet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gen66
Tom_K said:
In a 10 meter field of view, the ball traveling at 340 m/s would take 29 milliseconds to pass by.

According to Wiki: Observers can recall one specific image in an unbroken series of different images, each of which lasts as little as 13 milliseconds.So it may be just possible to spot the 340 m/s ball, but more than likely the persistence of vision will mask it and it will go by unseen, but certainly not unheard!

As for the 65 km/s no way you would see that!

These types of answers I love, pretty concrete answer, thank you sir!
 
  • #10
We have a ping pong ball cannon which shoots the ball at just under the speed of sound. In a classroom setting you cannot see the ping pong ball between the time the cannon is fired and when the ball hits the wall several meters away. On the other hand, that speed is not that much different from the speed of a jet aircraft. You can easily see such a jet fly by.
 
  • #11
BHS said:
We have a ping pong ball cannon which shoots the ball at just under the speed of sound. In a classroom setting you cannot see the ping pong ball between the time the cannon is fired and when the ball hits the wall several meters away.
What color are the balls and the wall? Have you tried shining a flashlight across its path?
 
  • #12
We have used white and orange ping pong balls. The walls are mostly various "academic cinder block off-whites," but in one case a darker gray and another a darkly stained wood door. We have not tried to shine a light across the ball's path. It would take less than a millisecond for the ball to cross the path of a typical flashlight. If the light were strong enough, and background dark enough, I am certain you could see it. After all, you can see a strobe light flash which is very short in duration. The question would be how much is enough?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
9K