Simultaneity in Special Relativity: Examining the Theory

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MartinWyckmans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simultaneity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of simultaneity in special relativity, particularly focusing on how different frames of reference affect the perception of simultaneous events. Participants explore hypothetical scenarios involving moving sensors and the propagation of light, as well as analogies to illustrate their points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a scenario involving a moving sensor and two falling balls, questioning the simultaneity of events as perceived from the sensor's frame of reference.
  • The participant proposes a formula for calculating time differences based on the sensor's velocity and the speed of light, leading to confusion about the validity of using (c+v) in their reasoning.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the speed of light is constant (c) in all inertial frames and challenges the notion that light could travel at 1 m/s relative to the sensor.
  • A third participant refers to the velocity addition formula in special relativity, indicating that light's speed remains c regardless of the sensor's motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial participant's understanding of simultaneity and the implications of their proposed scenarios. There are competing views regarding the interpretation of distances and speeds in different frames of reference.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of simultaneity in special relativity, with participants noting the relativity of distance and the necessity of using the correct velocity addition formula. There are unresolved aspects regarding the application of the proposed formulas in the context of special relativity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in the foundational concepts of special relativity, particularly those exploring the implications of simultaneity and the behavior of light in different inertial frames.

MartinWyckmans
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thanks for opening the millionth thread about this. My teacher has been explaining special relativity and I became confused at simultaneity.
This is my train of thought, where did I go wrong?

Say a sensor is moving at a speed of c-1 m/s to the right. Somewhere to the left of the sensor there's a wall with a small opening. 2 balls fall down behind the wall and the distance between the balls is 1 meter, and when they pass the small opening the ray of light that gets reflected by the ball gets sent through the opening. The ray of light moves to the right, towards the sensor, with a speed of c. Taking the sensor as point of view, the light travels towards the sensor with 1 m/s. If the second ray of light coming from the second ball hits the sensor 1 second later than the first sensor, then the rays of light began traveling at the same time and the balls would fall simultaneously. In other words, if \Delta t = \Delta x / (c-v) with \Delta t the time difference measured in the sensor, then the actions happen simultaneously.
And say the sensor is moving towards the wall/balls/ray of light, then the formula would be \Delta t = \Delta x / (c+v)
My teacher dismissed my question almost immediately because he said (c+v) is impossible, but I'm not saying the sensor is traveling with a speed that's (c+v). Is it still wrong?

I don't know if I've made myself very clear, so maybe an analogy works better.

Say there're 3 ancient cities; Sparta, Athens and Rome. One day, a messager from Athens visits Sparta, saying the city has been sacked. Two days later, a messager from Rome visits Sparta, saying Rome has been sacked. The Spartans are fearful and wonder whether the same empire sacked both cities. They know that the distance between Sparta and Athens is 200 kilometers and the distance between Sparta and Rome is 600 kilometers. The messagers are trained to run 200 kilometers each day. The time between the two messagers was 2 days. Calculating the time difference with the formula: \Delta t = \Delta x / v 2 = 400 / 200 and we see that the time difference is indeed 2 days.

Does this not apply in special relativity? I know that getting the right velocity v would be very difficult to really use, but is this how it theoretically works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
MartinWyckmans said:
... the distance between the balls is 1 meter...
In which frame of reference? Distance is relative.
MartinWyckmans said:
...the light travels towards the sensor with 1 m/s.
The light travels toward the sensor at speed c, the speed of light is c in every inertial frame of reference.
 
MartinWyckmans said:
Taking the sensor as point of view, the light travels towards the sensor with 1 m/s.

No, it doesn't. Velocities add differently in relativity; see here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula#Special_relativity

If you plug in c and c minus 1 m/sec in the formula, you will see that it gives the result c, which means that light moves at c relative to the sensor from the sensor's point of view.
 
Thanks both of you, I'm beginning to better understand it now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 221 ·
8
Replies
221
Views
17K