Would it be possible to make a self powered fan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uncleoscy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fan Self
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating a self-powered fan that generates electricity through its own motion, akin to wind turbines. Participants concluded that this concept is fundamentally flawed as it represents a perpetual motion machine, which is impossible according to the laws of physics. The thread was ultimately closed due to the established consensus against discussing perpetual motion machines. For further understanding, a reference to a PF Insights article on the topic was provided.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly energy conservation.
  • Familiarity with the concept of perpetual motion machines (PMMs).
  • Knowledge of mechanical systems and energy generation.
  • Awareness of the laws governing thermodynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the PF Insights article on perpetual motion machines for a comprehensive understanding.
  • Explore the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems.
  • Investigate alternative energy generation methods, such as solar or wind energy.
  • Study the laws of thermodynamics and their implications on energy systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, engineering students, inventors, and anyone interested in the principles of energy generation and conservation.

uncleoscy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you were to have a fan, that has a button, that whenever you press it, the blades rotate (like those mini fans you can find at stores). But, when the blades rotate, they power electricity that powers the fan itself? Kind of like wind turbines but without the wind part.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
uncleoscy said:
If you were to have a fan, that has a button, that whenever you press it, the blades rotate (like those mini fans you can find at stores). But, when the blades rotate, they power electricity that powers the fan itself? Kind of like wind turbines but without the wind part.
Nope, that would an impossible perpetual motion machine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, DrClaude and Lord Jestocost
Per the rules, we do not discuss perpetual motion machines, so this thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K