Would like to help out my brother

  • Thread starter Thread starter BioCore
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on helping a gifted first-year high school student improve his skills in mathematics and physics. The focus is on selecting appropriate textbooks and resources to prepare him for advanced topics. Recommendations include using R.A. Adams' "Calculus: A Complete Course" to enhance his understanding of calculus concepts, such as differentiation, while also introducing related physics principles. The importance of aligning study materials with the school curriculum is emphasized to avoid confusion. There is a consideration of the student's interests in physics, particularly in electromagnetism and quantum physics, which will guide the selection of topics to explore. The discussion highlights the need to balance challenge with engagement to maintain the student's interest in learning.
BioCore
Hey everyone,

I have been trying t help my brother get better at school and just make him more interested. He is currently finishing up his first grade of high school.

I noticed that he is very gifted in mathematics and enjoys physics somewhat. So I was thinking of helping him prepare a bit for this, as he has told me he would like to study a bit ahead.

I was wondering what the best course of action would be for this. Since he should advance his knowledge of mathematics a lot more in order to understand Physics, I am in need of some help for which textbooks to use?

Thanks for any help, greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd be nice if you could get hold of the textbook he'll be using, so you can go through it in the same order. I can imagine that you would want to offer him some extra mathematical background. For example, if the textbook starts with mechanics, you could try to cover the material he'll be supposed to know now (F = m a \cos(\alpha), and such) and when the class actually gets to that, try to learn him something about vectors and where the \cos(\alpha) comes from. And for example, when the mathematics class starts to teach differentiation, you could go through it a little faster and also introduce the exponential function, logarithms, etc., such that you can show him e.g. applications in physics and give him some more challenging exercises while the rest of the class takes 3 weeks to learn the chain rule. From experience I know that for interested and above-average mathematics skilled students, this is certainly reasonable to do.

But of course, it depends on what he likes, what he is able to do. I don't have a long experience with this, so I don't know if keeping him challenged all the time will always stimulate him or might have the opposite effect and make him lose interest after a year or two. And of course, always pay attention that he learns relevant stuff such that he doesn't get confused with what's he supposed to know (e.g. don't teach him complex numbers until after the test on quadratic equations, where you are supposed to write down that x^2 + 1 = 0 has no solutions :smile:).
 
I think you should actually give him this book R.A Adams calculus: a complete course [ISBN: 0321270002].

Then when he goes through something, like differentiation. He should look it up in Adams and use it as a reference where he can dig deeper.

About physics, what kinds of physics is he interested in?
 
Thank you both for the feedback. I will try to see how he responds to different inputs and all. As for what physics he seems interested in, I am not sure completely but I would say something related to E&M, and probably even some Quantum (Molecular) Physics. But I will have to ask him directly as to what he enjoys the most.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top