Would you take a look at this Thesis summary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thesis
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thesis summary related to the design and implementation of a measuring station for analyzing capillary tubes in thermostatic controllers. Participants provide feedback on the clarity and structure of the summary, focusing on the articulation of the problem being addressed and the overall coherence of the content.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the first sentence should clearly state the problem or question being addressed in the thesis.
  • Another participant agrees that the abstract should explain the purpose of the research earlier and questions the clarity of certain phrases, such as "characteristics of (the?) flow" and the use of compressed air and demineralized water as flow media.
  • Concerns are raised about the ambiguity regarding which products are being tested and the necessity of flow in the production of thermostatic controllers, suggesting that this may need further explanation for clarity.
  • A suggestion is made to start with a concise summary of the research, followed by a brief explanation of the production process and the specific issues being investigated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the thesis summary requires improvements in clarity and structure, but there is no consensus on the specific changes needed or how to best articulate the problem being addressed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the clarity of certain technical terms and the overall flow of the summary, indicating that assumptions about the audience's familiarity with the subject matter may not hold.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals seeking feedback on academic writing, particularly in technical fields, as well as those interested in thesis development and clarity in scientific communication.

Grz
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone,

I hope this is a proper place to post this message.
I would like to ask you to take a look at this Thesis summary. It is important that it be a person familiar with the jargon. I am not a native speaker of English and want to make sure that I do not say rubbish in the summary. I would really appreciate if you took a few seconds to look and tell me if it sounds legit.

The thesis describes the designing and making of a measuring station to analyze capillary tubes used in thermostatic controllers in IMI Hydronic Engineering. The apparatus was used to measure and describe the characteristics of (the?) flow. The survey was carried out with the use of compressed air and demineralized water.The reason behind carrying out the tests was to find problems with the production process resulting in faulty products. The tests were also to find out at which stage of the production of thermostatic controllers disturbance or lack of flow occurred. In the last part of the thesis one can find suggestions for enhancing the efficiency of the production process. The thesis also includes measurements of flow losses during air and water flow. The experiment involved different types of capillary tubes used in thermostatic controllers and also an extra tube which was squashed for the sake of the experiment. The aim was to see how limited patency affects the production process.

Archivizing and parameter reading were assisted by LabView software.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not a native speaker either so I will focus on the content, not on language.

I agree that the abstract should describe why this is done earlier.
Grz said:
The apparatus was used to measure and describe the characteristics of (the?) flow.
Flow where, how, why? Also, that is a bit redundant to the first sentence.
Grz said:
The survey was carried out with the use of compressed air and demineralized water.
As flow media?
Grz said:
The reason behind carrying out the tests was to find problems with the production process resulting in faulty products.
Which products?
Grz said:
The tests were also to find out at which stage of the production of thermostatic controllers disturbance or lack of flow occurred.
This answers the previous question. I guess the production of those controllers needs some flow, but at least for me it is unclear why and how. Unless this is absolutely clear for everyone in your field, it might be useful to explain the production process.

Suggestion: Start with a one-sentence summary what you did, then explain the production process in one or two lines, explain which part is problematic, then describe what you did to investigate this.
 
Thank you both, jedishrfu amd mfb!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K