Writing Tensor Equations in Matrix Form

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the tensor equation F'^{\mu\nu}=\Lambda^{\mu}_{\sigma}\Lambda^{\nu}_{\rho}F^{\sigma\rho} in matrix form using 4x4 matrices. Participants suggest that the correct matrix representation could be either F' = \Lambda^{\top} F \Lambda or F' = \Lambda F \Lambda^{\top}, depending on how tensors are mapped to matrices. It is emphasized that careful attention to index placement is crucial, as tensors and matrices have different structures. The transformation of mixed tensors is also noted, highlighting that G' = \Lambda G \Lambda^{-1} applies to mixed tensors. Ultimately, clarity in notation is essential for accurate representation in matrix form.
lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
I'm trying to express the tensor equation F'^{\mu\nu}=\Lambda^{\mu}_{\sigma}\Lambda^{\nu}_{ \rho }F^{\sigma\rho} in matrix form. Here the indices range from 0 to 3, so we need 4 by 4 matrices. Let F', F, and \Lambda be the matrices associated with the tensors appearing in our equation. Which of the following is the correct matrix translation of the tensor equation?

F'=\Lambda F \Lambda

F'=\Lambda \Lambda F

F'=\Lambda^{\top} F \Lambda

F'=\Lambda F \Lambda^{\top}

Or something else entirely?

I tried testing some of these out on the actual four-by-four matrices, but the algebra got too cumbersome. Usually when I figure out what order to put things in and where to put the transposes, I'm in a situation where I'm dealing with matrices and vectors, so that if you put it in the wrong order then the numbers of rows and columns don't match up. But in this case everything is four-by-four, so there is plenty of room for error.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lugita15 said:
I'm trying to express the tensor equation F'^{\mu\nu}=\Lambda^{\mu}_{\sigma}\Lambda^{\nu}_{ \rho }F^{\sigma\rho} in matrix form.

F'=\Lambda^{\top} F \Lambda

F'=\Lambda F \Lambda^{\top}

It will be one of these two, depending on how you decide to map your tensors to matrices.

You see, a tensor and a matrix are not quite the same thing. A matrix is most naturally thought of as a "mixed" tensor, with one index up and one down: M^a{}_b. Then the matrix product is quite natural to write:

M^a{}_c = K^a{}_b L^b{}_c

On the other hand, a tensor with two "up" indices is technically considered a column vector whose elements are column vectors. However, the multiplication algorithm will end up being the same as matrix multiplication. To translate it to matrices, you just need to follow the indices carefully:

\Lambda^a{}_c \Lambda^b{}_d F^{cd} = \Lambda^a{}_c F^{cd} \Lambda^b{}_d = \Lambda^a{}_c F^{cd} (\Lambda^\top)_d{}^b
where in the last step, we take the transpose because we need to switch the order of b and d to make it look like a matrix product. So we can write

F' = \Lambda F \Lambda^\top
provided we interpret the first index of F as a row index, and the second as a column index.

However, you should be careful with this notation to be clear what you mean. If we had a mixed tensor G^a{}_b, then in matrix notation its transformation would be

G' = \Lambda G \Lambda^{-1}
For the pure "up" tensor F^{ab}, the most mathematically-correct way to write its transformation law is

F' = (\Lambda \otimes \Lambda) \cdot F
where now F is unfolded into a single column vector with n \times n entries.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
726
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K