I Writing Velocity as dx/dt in K= ∫mvdv = ∫m dx/dt dv - Does it Make Sense?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter STAR GIRL
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Velocity is defined as the rate of change of position (x) with respect to time (t), leading to the equation v = dx/dt. This relationship allows for the substitution of v with dx/dt in the equation K = ∫mvdv = ∫m dx/dt dv. The discussion confirms that this substitution is valid and makes sense within the context of physics. Understanding this definition is crucial for applying it in equations related to kinetic energy. The clarification provided resolves the initial query about the relationship between velocity and position over time.
STAR GIRL
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
In equation K= ∫mvdv = ∫m dx/dt dv, how can we write v at any time t as dx/dt?? Does it make any sense??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
STAR GIRL said:
In equation K= ∫mvdv = ∫m dx/dt dv, how can we write v at any time t as dx/dt?? Does it make any sense??
This is how velocity is defined. How do you define velocity?
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
fresh_42 said:
This is how velocity is defined. How do you define velocity?
I just want to know that how can we write v as dx/dt
 
Well, velocity is the rate of change of position (x) with respect to time (t). So v=dx/dt by definition.
 
  • Like
Likes STAR GIRL
Ibix said:
Well, velocity is the rate of change of position (x) with respect to time (t). So v=dx/dt by definition.
Yup I got it. Thanks
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top