WTA : does atomic mass matter to atom's radius?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the atomic radius ratio between Helium-3 (He-3) and Helium-4 (He-4). It is concluded that while both isotopes have the same atomic radius due to having the same number of electrons, their nuclear radii differ. The atomic radius ratio is determined to be 1, indicating they are the same. The formula R=R_0*A^(1/3) is referenced to explain the relationship between mass number and nuclear radius. Overall, the atomic radius remains unchanged between the two isotopes, while the nuclear radius varies.
adi adi
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


so my friend asked this question: "what's the atomic radius ratio between He-3 and He-4?"
2. Homework Equations

all i know is this equation : r =nh/mv
3. The Attempt at a Solution

i thought the ratio will be same because both He-3 and He-4 have only two electrons. Correct me if I am wrong please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nuclear radius will be different but atomic radius will remain the same. As atomic radius is the distance between the center of the nuclei to the outermost electron-which is same for both.

ratio is 1 and 'not same'
 
ash64449 said:
Nuclear radius will be different but atomic radius will remain the same. As atomic radius is the distance between the center of the nuclei to the outermost electron-which is same for both.

ratio is 1 and 'not same'
so to make clear things the ratio of atomic radius is same but the nuclear radius isn't same right?
 
adi adi said:
ratio of atomic radius is same

You should actually say atomic radius of both are same and ratio is 1.
adi adi said:
nuclear radius isn't same right?

yes. You can understand it by the formula:

R=R_0*A^(1/3)

where A-Mass number, R_0 is a constant
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top