X = Asin(wt + angle) and circular motion diagram?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation x = Asin(wt) in the context of simple harmonic motion (SHM) and its representation in circular motion diagrams. A participant questions why the sine function is used for displacement when it seems to represent the length of the opposite side rather than the actual displacement. Another contributor clarifies that the general solution for SHM can be expressed using both sine and cosine functions, with phase constants differing between them. They explain that using trigonometric identities allows for the conversion between these forms, emphasizing the relationship between the sine and cosine representations. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately interpreting SHM equations and their graphical representations.
applestrudle
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
This is the type of diagram I'm talking about:

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rc...VBtPdh26viVXkWaWL6rTIk7w&ust=1385070490503327

It's the image the image next to Quest 3T

If x = Asin(wt) surely the x value is the length of the opposite side, not the displacement of the object in SHM?
I understand if x = Acos(wt) but why is it always written x = Asin(wt)?!
sin(wt) doesn't give that length along the horizontal axis?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really don't understand what you're asking, your link didn't really work. Maybe you could explain your question better?



The general solution to the SHM equation is ##x(t)= A\cos (\omega t+\phi) + B\sin (\omega t+\phi)##.

The equations that link was using were from using a trig identity on the general solution. The idienty: ##\cos (C+D) = \cos (C)\cos (D) - \sin (C) \sin (D)##, if you plug in the right values, you end up with the desired equations.

The key is that the phase constants will be different for the ##\sin## and ##\cos## versions. If you recall that ##\sin (\alpha + \frac{\pi}{2}) = \cos (\alpha )##, it's only a matter of "lining" them up to get an equivalent expression. All of the different versions of the SHM solution have constants that are related by fixed equations.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top