X-Ray photon/wavelength question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moomba44
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    X-ray
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the emission of an X-ray photon by a fast-moving electron colliding with steel, specifically focusing on calculating the wavelength of the emitted photon based on its energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between energy, frequency, and wavelength of photons, referencing relevant equations such as E=hf and v=fλ. There are attempts to calculate frequency and wavelength, with some participants questioning their calculations and the correctness of their methods.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the equations to use, while others are actively checking their calculations and expressing uncertainty about their results. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, with participants confirming each other's understanding and addressing potential errors in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention issues with calculator outputs and the need to ensure proper unit conversions, indicating a focus on the accuracy of numerical results and the potential for confusion in calculations.

Moomba44
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is one of the questions on my regular worksheets we have before our tests:

A fast-moving electron traveling through a vacuum tube slams into a piece of steel, coming abruptly to rest and emitting an X-ray photon with an energy of 7.90×10-16 J. What is the wavelength of the photon?

I know I have to find the frequency and speed of the photon in order to find the wavelength. The problem is I do not know how to find either of the two (I had a long day at work so I'm pretty sure I'm just having a brain fart right now). If someone could help point me in the right direction it would be more than appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons always travel at 3x10^8 m/s, the speed of light.
 
For a photon:
[tex]E=hf[/tex]
[tex]E=[/tex]Energy of the photon
[tex]h=[/tex]Planck's Constant
[tex]f=[/tex]Frequency

and of course for any wave [tex]v=f \lambda[/tex], and like Pengwuin said in the case of photons your velocity is about 3x108 m/s
 
Edit: Thank you dav, I thought I was on the right track but you confirmed it. Thanks a bunch guys!
 
Okay, I think I had better post again, because something is surely off in what I am doing with this problem. My answer that I got for Frequency was something in the neighborhood of 1.16x10^-50 s, and whenever I plug that into the wavelength equation and solve for wavelength I get the astronomical number of 2.58x10^58 cm/s.

Am I doing this problem right and should be getting a number that high? Or am I off in some of my calculations?
 
Look at the E=hf equation more carefully... I think you multiplied instead of divided.

Also keep in mind that wavelength has dimensions of length.
 
to find f I've been putting in f = E/h, which I've been imputting as the energy from the original problem, 7.9 x 10^-16, divided by h, so it looks like 7.9 x 10^-16/6.626 x 10^-34. Is this wrong right here or is my calculator possibly giving me funky numbers for no reason? lol.
 
[tex]\frac {7.9 \cdot 10^{-16}(J)}{6.626 \cdot 10^{-34}(J \cdot s)}[/tex] gives me a frequency of [tex]1.19 \cdot 10^{18} (\frac {1}{s})[/tex].
 
Last edited:
yeah, I realized i was putting something wrong into the equation, so for wavelength I got .252 cm...which corresponds to 2,520,000 nanometers...is this close to being right or am I still screwing something up?
 
  • #10
You divided 3x108m/s by 1.19x1018 1/s and got .00252 meters?

Check your calculations.
 
  • #11
Okay, I redid everything and I got 2.521x10^-9 m for the wavelength...I might as well take baby steps since either I or my calculator is screwing up what I type, so is this calculation correct? And if so, to convert it to nanometers I'm supposed to divide by 10^-9 if I'm not mistaken.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K