What is the proper notation for recursion in LaTex?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob3141592
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Recursion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses issues with LaTeX notation for recursion, highlighting a user's initial struggles with formatting. A request for deletion of the original post indicates dissatisfaction with the clarity of the content. A specific technical question arises regarding the visibility of LaTeX formulas, with a solution provided about the correct use of the forward slash in the closing itex tag. The conversation includes minimal substantive content beyond these technical points. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper notation in LaTeX for effective communication.
Bob3141592
Messages
236
Reaction score
2
Okay, my first attempt at LaTex was terrible, and the post originally made in this space was undecipherable. I requestd this thread be deleted, and I'll be posting a proper (I hope) version in a separate thread.

Thanks for your patience.

Bob
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How come only the first LaTex formula is showing up typeset? What am I doing wrong?
 
You need a forward slash in the closing itex tag, not a backslash.
 
LaTex notation experimentation - no other content, so don't pay any attention to this post.

({\colv{a}{b}})
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top