Xyx^-1y^-1 a Lie group homomorphism?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sajet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Lie group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the verification of the group homomorphism property for the map \(\varphi_y\) defined in the context of Lie groups, specifically referencing the script from MIT on representation theory. The participants express difficulty in proving that \(\varphi_y(x_1x_2) = \varphi_y(x_1)\varphi_y(x_2)\) holds true without prior knowledge of the theorem's validity. They conclude that proving the map is smooth suffices for their purposes, as the image under \(G\) is connected, leading to the conclusion that the set must be exactly \(\{e\}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with group homomorphisms
  • Knowledge of smooth maps in differential geometry
  • Basic concepts of representation theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie group homomorphisms in detail
  • Explore the concept of smooth maps in the context of Lie groups
  • Review the representation theory of Lie groups as outlined in the MIT script
  • Investigate examples of specific Lie groups to see homomorphism properties in action
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebra and geometry, as well as students studying Lie groups and representation theory.

Sajet
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi! I was just going through this script on Lie groups: http://www.mit.edu/~ssam/repthy.pdf

At one point the following is said:

(see attachment)

I've spent multiple hours trying to figure out why this is a group homomorphism. Sure, once you know the theorem is correct, this follows. But without knowing this, I can't figure out why it should be.

I want to see that:

\varphi_y(x_1x_2) = \varphi_y(x_1)\varphi_y(x_2) \Leftrightarrow x_1x_2yx_2^{-1}x_1^{-1}y^{-1} = x_1yx_1^{-1}y^{-1}x_2yx_2^{-1}y^{-1}


If I write x_1y = \bar y_1x_1, x_2y = \bar y_2x_2, then the above equation is equivalent to

x_1\bar y_2x_1^{-1} = \bar y_1y^{-1}\bar y_2

but I don't get any further from here.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 567
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyways, I think whether or not this is a homomorphism is not necessary for this proof. One can just argue that this map is smooth since G is a Lie group, therefore the image under G is connected, therefore it is a one point set and since eye-1y-1 = e one gets that this set must be exactly {e}.
 
Sajet said:
Anyways, I think whether or not this is a homomorphism is not necessary for this proof. One can just argue that this map is smooth since G is a Lie group, therefore the image under G is connected, therefore it is a one point set and since eye-1y-1 = e one gets that this set must be exactly {e}.



I agree with you: I can't either see how that map is a homomorphism in a general case, but it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

DonAntonio
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
12K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K