Young modulus (deriving formula)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of Young's modulus (E) and the correct expression relating it to stress and strain. The participants clarify that the correct formula for Young's modulus is E = L/(A x gradient), where L is the original length, A is the cross-sectional area, and gradient is the slope of the ΔL versus F graph. The confusion arises from a misinterpretation of the textbook's notation, which incorrectly presents the formula as L(A x gradient). The correct understanding emphasizes that both A and the gradient are in the denominator of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebra and manipulation of equations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of stress (σ) and strain (ε)
  • Knowledge of the relationship between force, area, and Young's modulus
  • Ability to interpret graphical data, specifically linear relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Young's modulus in detail, focusing on stress and strain relationships
  • Learn how to plot and interpret graphs of force versus elongation (ΔL)
  • Explore unit analysis to verify physical equations and their correctness
  • Review common misconceptions in physics textbooks regarding material properties
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on material science, mechanical engineering, or anyone seeking to clarify the concept of Young's modulus and its derivation.

coconut62
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
Quoted from my book:
"The graph of ΔL against F has gradient L/EA, so the Young modulus E is equal to L(A x gradient)."

E is (stress/strain).

I don't understand that sentence. If I substitute the gradient into E= L(A x gradient), then

E= L(A)(L/EA)

E= L(L/E)

E= L^2 /E

E square = L square?

This doesn't seem to make sense. Can someone explain to me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coconut62 said:
Quoted from my book:
"The graph of ΔL against F has gradient L/EA, so the Young modulus E is equal to L(A x gradient)."

The last expression here is incorrect. If the gradient equals L/(EA), then what would be the correct expression for E in terms of L, A, and the gradient?
 
The stress σ is equal to the force per unit area F/A.

σ=F/A

The strain ε is equal to ΔL/L:

ε =ΔL/L

The stress is equal to the strain times Young's modulus:

σ = E ε

If we eliminate the stress σ and the strain ε from these equations, we get

\Delta L=(\frac{L}{AE})F

If you plot a graph of ΔL versus F, you will get a straight line through the origin with a slope (gradient) of L/AE. So E will be equal to L/A divided by the slope.
 
So does that mean the textbook is wrong?

E is supposed to be L/A(gradient) instead of L(A x gradient) ?
 
Yes. That's right. E = L/(A*gradient). Both A and the gradient are in the denominator.
 
coconut62 said:
So does that mean the textbook is wrong?

E is supposed to be L/A(gradient) instead of L(A x gradient) ?

I have trouble understanding your rendition of the algebra. The L is in the numerator, the A is in the denominator, and the gradient is in the denominator. E = L/(A x gradient). Is this what your textbook says?
 
No, my textbook doesn't have the "/" , just L (Ax gradient).

So the actual equation is E= L/(A*gradient), correct?
 
coconut62 said:
No, my textbook doesn't have the "/" , just L (Ax gradient).

So the actual equation is E= L/(A*gradient), correct?

Do you honestly feel that you need to ask me this question? What does your knowledge of algebra tell you? Another way of figuring out which result is correct is to check the units. The units of E have to be force per unit area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K