Young modulus (deriving formula)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of the Young modulus formula in the context of material mechanics. Participants are examining the relationship between stress, strain, and the gradient of a graph plotting extension against force.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the correct expression for Young's modulus based on the gradient of a graph. There is confusion regarding the algebraic manipulation of the formula and the placement of variables in the equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered alternative interpretations of the formula, suggesting that the textbook may contain an error. There is ongoing exploration of the correct relationship between Young's modulus, area, and the gradient, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are questioning the accuracy of the textbook's presentation of the formula and are considering the implications of unit consistency in their reasoning.

coconut62
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
Quoted from my book:
"The graph of ΔL against F has gradient L/EA, so the Young modulus E is equal to L(A x gradient)."

E is (stress/strain).

I don't understand that sentence. If I substitute the gradient into E= L(A x gradient), then

E= L(A)(L/EA)

E= L(L/E)

E= L^2 /E

E square = L square?

This doesn't seem to make sense. Can someone explain to me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coconut62 said:
Quoted from my book:
"The graph of ΔL against F has gradient L/EA, so the Young modulus E is equal to L(A x gradient)."

The last expression here is incorrect. If the gradient equals L/(EA), then what would be the correct expression for E in terms of L, A, and the gradient?
 
The stress σ is equal to the force per unit area F/A.

σ=F/A

The strain ε is equal to ΔL/L:

ε =ΔL/L

The stress is equal to the strain times Young's modulus:

σ = E ε

If we eliminate the stress σ and the strain ε from these equations, we get

\Delta L=(\frac{L}{AE})F

If you plot a graph of ΔL versus F, you will get a straight line through the origin with a slope (gradient) of L/AE. So E will be equal to L/A divided by the slope.
 
So does that mean the textbook is wrong?

E is supposed to be L/A(gradient) instead of L(A x gradient) ?
 
Yes. That's right. E = L/(A*gradient). Both A and the gradient are in the denominator.
 
coconut62 said:
So does that mean the textbook is wrong?

E is supposed to be L/A(gradient) instead of L(A x gradient) ?

I have trouble understanding your rendition of the algebra. The L is in the numerator, the A is in the denominator, and the gradient is in the denominator. E = L/(A x gradient). Is this what your textbook says?
 
No, my textbook doesn't have the "/" , just L (Ax gradient).

So the actual equation is E= L/(A*gradient), correct?
 
coconut62 said:
No, my textbook doesn't have the "/" , just L (Ax gradient).

So the actual equation is E= L/(A*gradient), correct?

Do you honestly feel that you need to ask me this question? What does your knowledge of algebra tell you? Another way of figuring out which result is correct is to check the units. The units of E have to be force per unit area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K