Young's Experiment and the Wave-Particle Model

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kennedy111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Model
Click For Summary
Young's experiment demonstrates that high-speed electrons can produce interference patterns, indicating their wave-like behavior, which supports the wave-particle model of quantum mechanics. The discussion suggests exploring de Broglie's equation to understand the wave properties of particles and how they relate to diffraction patterns seen with light. It raises questions about why macroscopic objects, like tennis balls, do not exhibit wave behavior due to their relatively low speeds compared to subatomic particles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping these concepts to succeed in physics. Understanding the dual nature of particles is crucial for mastering the subject.
Kennedy111
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How do the results of performing Young's experiment with x-rays and then high speed electrons support the wave-particle model?

The Attempt at a Solution


The experiment showed that an electron traveling at high speeds are capable of making interference patters, which is a characteristic of waves.

I'm not sure as to what to add on to this, could you please help? Give me ideas?

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe talk about de Broglie's equation and its origins, discussing or providing pictures of the sort of fringe pattern you would see when light is passed through a diffraction grating and relate it to that. This is outside my understanding but maybe even look briefly (or deeply, depending on how big this assignment is) on the different understandings of why electrons behave as waves.
Why is it in the macrophysical world that we could never model tennis balls as waves or other similar point objects? Is it because their relative speed is minute?

Don't know if that helps, kinda suck at Physics but I'm trying to keep my knowledge in check - I got to or I'll barely pass Physics for a second time ;D Hope something I said did help!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K