Youngs Modulus of copper wire experiment

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment to determine Young's modulus of copper wire, focusing on the calculations of stress, strain, and the resulting modulus based on experimental data. Participants are analyzing their results and seeking clarification on their computations and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are sharing their calculations for Young's modulus and questioning the accuracy of their strain and stress values. There is a discussion about the relationship between stress and strain, with some participants expressing confusion over the low strain values compared to the calculated stress.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified potential errors in their calculations, particularly regarding the diameter used for cross-sectional area. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of these errors on the calculated Young's modulus, with references to known values for copper. Guidance has been offered regarding significant figures and the importance of accurate measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of experimental data and are attempting to reconcile their findings with established values for Young's modulus of copper, which is noted to be around 117 GPa. There is mention of uncertainty in measurements and calculations, particularly regarding the diameter of the wire and its impact on results.

jokiemay
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I’m doing some basic young’s modulus homework and I think I’ve solved it but I want other people to give their answers to see if the match my own. Its young are of copper wire.
2. Homework Equations
E = stress over strain
Stress = applied force (F) over Cross sectional area (A)
Strain = Extension (e) over Original length (Lo)
A = 0.27mm
F = mxg
Lo = 1.788m
e = variable

My table of results are:
M / kg e / mm
0.100 0.45
0.200 0.94
0.300 1.40
0.400 1.97
0.500 2.46
0.600 3.29
0.700 4.12
0.800 5.00
0.900 6.36
1.000 8.223. The Attempt at a Solution

I’ve worked it out with 0.100kg

M (0.100) x g (9.81) = 0.981 so F = 0.981
Pi x 0.27 squared over 4 = 0.05725566 so A = 0.05725566

So stress = 17.13371733038794867967

e = 0.45
Lo = 1.788

So strain = 0.25167785234899

Young’s Modulus = 68.0779701927423389726993185

I know I’m going wrong somewhere so any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have an error in your strain computation. You seem to be dividing mm/m.
 
Ohh yes i see that - i know I am going wrong somehwere and i can't get my head fully around that.

Why would the strain be such a low figure but the stress be so high

Im sure 00025167785235 is to low for strain
 
Ohh yes i see that - i know I am going wrong somewhere and i can't get my head fully around that.

Why would the strain be such a low figure but the stress be so high

Im sure 00025167785235 is to low for strain
 
Last edited:
im getting 68077.97019246913753978559011651

couldnt be right
 
Because

sigma = e * E

where E is Young's Modulus, a large number. Strain, e, is small. For steel, the modulus is 30X10^6 psi. sigma is stress. So as an example, for a strain of 0.00025, the stress is 7500 psi. Reasonable stress example.
 
so would be answer of 68077.97019246913753978559011651 be right ?
 
Units would be N/mm^2. Watch your significant figures. Based on your first set of data, you did it correctly but consider the comment below.

You say A is area and its value is 0.27 mm. Is that a typo? Should 0.27 be the diameter? That is how you used it.

I looked up the modulus for Cu. It's somewhat higher than what you calculate.
 
Yes the 0.27 is the diameter which is the cross sectional area (A)

I calculated that as Pi x 0.27squared / 4

Thanks very much for your help so far.
 
  • #10
can anybody else hint to me where I am going wrong as i see Cu is suppost to be 117GPa
 
  • #11
If you plot your data, the curve looks ok. Are you certain you measured the diameter and wire length correctly?
 
  • #12
Hi there - My mistake was the diameter - it should have been calculated as 0.000573mm or 5.73x10-3

so the result in getting now is 6.03 x 10(10) Pa as the youngs modulus.

Im also working out the percentage error;

ive worked out the length as 1.788m +/- 0.01m so 0.01/1.788 x 100 = +/- 0.56%

does this look correct?

My next task is to work out the percentage uncertainty of the cross section area and the gradient of the graph.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
32K