Is it possible to accurately measure the Young's modulus of wood?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on accurately measuring the Young's modulus of wood, specifically oak, using a dynamic investigation method. The proposed method involves fixing one end of a wood sample and applying a load while measuring the extension with a traveling microscope, increasing the load by 0.1 kg. It is crucial to apply the load in the direction of the fibers due to wood's anisotropic nature. Additionally, factors such as moisture content and span-to-depth ratio significantly influence the accuracy of the measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's modulus and its significance in material science.
  • Familiarity with dynamic testing methods for materials.
  • Knowledge of anisotropic materials, particularly wood.
  • Experience with measuring devices such as traveling microscopes and strain gauges.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research dynamic methods for measuring Young's modulus in materials.
  • Learn about the effects of moisture content on the mechanical properties of wood.
  • Investigate the significance of span-to-depth ratio in flexural modulus testing.
  • Explore the differences between tensile and compressive modulus in anisotropic materials.
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, mechanical engineers, and researchers involved in wood mechanics and testing methodologies will benefit from this discussion.

allthewayhome
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am currently carrying out an dynamic investigation of young's modulus for various linear materials such as copper, steel, and nylon but I am unsure how to find the modulus for wood.

I have several ideas including fixing one end of a sample length of wood to bench while placing a fixed load on the other and measure the extension, then work out the tensile force and strain from that.

Would this work?
Does anyone have any ideas or advice/criticism?

Regards,
Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it should work. Note only that you'll get a greater modulus of elasticity if the applied load is in the direction of the fibers, since wood is anisotropic.
 
This is the basic idea here with the load perpendicular to the fibres.

Wood (oak)
______________________ initial heigth under zero load
---------------- l
Bench l
l
l
l
(load X)

I was planning to measure the extension using a traveling microscope under a load x, increasing X by 0.1 kg.

The reason I am doing it this way is that the apparatus that the lab i use may not be able to accomadte the wood sample vertically with the load parallel to the fibres.

Can anyone point me in the direction(online) with details for this method or any other dynamic method for measuring young's modulus.
 
Last edited:
http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr113/ch04.pdf

I have a suspicion that the correlation you get between calculated stress and strain will not be in the ballpark. The moisture content in actual test conditions is controlled. Mark's Handbook has a pretty good chart of wood mechanical properties.
 
allthewayhome said:
This is the basic idea here with the load perpendicular to the fibres.

Wood (oak)
______________________ initial heigth under zero load
---------------- l
Bench l
l
l
l
(load X)

I was planning to measure the extension using a traveling microscope under a load x, increasing X by 0.1 kg.

The reason I am doing it this way is that the apparatus that the lab i use may not be able to accomadte the wood sample vertically with the load parallel to the fibres.

Can anyone point me in the direction(online) with details for this method or any other dynamic method for measuring young's modulus.

You could use a strain gauge to measure the deformation.

These links may help
http://midas.npl.co.uk/midas/content/mn016.html
http://www.materials.ox.ac.uk/teaching/practicals/1P2youngsmodulus.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hey,
I am not sure whether this is directly related, but I am trying to understand why the Elastic modulus of wood is different under compression and tension.
I believe it has something to do with the fact they are an organic substance made up of cells rather than a pure element or alloy.
Is this the case?
 
Just want to add that in order to measure the flexural modulus accurately, the span-to-depth ratio that you use should be at least 6, preferably up to 16. Span to depth ratio is the length from the cantilever point to the load application point divided by the thickness of the beam. If the wood is laminated, the modulus so measured can differ from the tensile modulus by 15% to 40%. What if you have a short S-T-D ratio, the shear coupling effect can affect your results.
 
I would think that the tensile modulus is higher than the compressive modulus - one can assume that the fibers are naturally misaligned in wood. When loaded in tension, the fibers tend to align with the loading axis, thus making the material stiffer. Under compressive load, the fibers tend to deviate more from the loading axis, making it less stiff. When it comes to compressive testing for modulus, the tested specimen has to scaled to avoid buckling, i.e. the radius of gyration has to be carefully determined ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
28K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K