You're too much of a mathematician if

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edgardo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematician
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
32 replies · 19K views
Edgardo
Messages
707
Reaction score
17
You're too much a mathematician if ...

Hi all,

I thought it would be funny to open a thread like this.
So feel free to post!


You're too much of a mathematician if ...

... if you think that "epsilon < 0" is funny.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
IF you think? It is funny. :biggrin:
 
omg I didn't understand it, thank God..!
 
...if you think that the x-component of the vector formed by your instructors mustache is at its largest value at [tex]\cos \theta = 1[/tex]
 
... if you think the reason the downtown area is called the center is because everyone commutes there.
 
.. you can (finally) tell a doughnut from a coffee mug.
 
Thrice said:
.. you can (finally) tell a doughnut from a coffee mug.

Wouldn't you be a normal person if you can do that? :rolleyes:
 
Oblef said:
omg I didn't understand it, thank God..!
lol, i didn't understand the first one either

but the others are pretty funny so far
 
neutrino said:
Wouldn't you be a normal person if you can do that? :rolleyes:
The "finally" is important.

...if you deny that there can be such a thing as "too much of a mathematician"... and subsequently disappear in a puff of logic.
 
...if you use the word "trivial" or "evident" more than once a day
 
...if you think .999999999=1:-p

<runs and hides>
 
Lisa! said:
...if you think .999999999=1:-p

<runs and hides>

You see, now that would be an engineer/physicist.

I presume you meant 0.9999999... = 1. :wink:
 
neutrino said:
You see, now that would be an engineer/physicist.

I presume you meant 0.9999999... = 1. :wink:
Oops...no , now that's a real mathematician considring this 1:

You are a mathematician if you say 'A', write 'B' but mean 'C':biggrin:
 
If you begin a day to day argument: " For all x such that..."
 
Lisa! said:
Oops...no , now that's a real mathematician considring this 1:

You are a mathematician if you say 'A', write 'B' but mean 'C':biggrin:

that one is good
 
Lisa! said:
Oops...no , now that's a real mathematician considring this 1:

You are a mathematician if you say 'A', write 'B' but mean 'C':biggrin:

The professors dilemma: He says 'A', he writes 'B', he means 'C', but it should really be 'D'.

Comes from Polya's How to Solve It
 
TeTeC said:
...if you use the word "trivial" or "evident" more than once a day
I can't remember it off hand, but there is at least one mathematical term that I use in everyday conversation, because there isn't an 'ordinary' English word that carries precisely the meaning I intend.
 
ZioX said:
The professors dilemma: He says 'A', he writes 'B', he means 'C', but it should really be 'D'.

Comes from Polya's How to Solve It
:smile:
Thanks!

I can't remember it off hand, but there is at least one mathematical term that I use in everyday conversation, because there isn't an 'ordinary' English word that carries precisely the meaning I intend.

Great! You're a real mathematician:approve:
 
Last edited:
When you and your friends sit around trying to think about whether there are any foods whose boundary is a surface of genus two.
 
Hurkyl said:
I can't remember it off hand, but there is at least one mathematical term that I use in everyday conversation, because there isn't an 'ordinary' English word that carries precisely the meaning I intend.

I use the word "clearly" quite often-- a word I rarely used before studying maths!
 
qspeechc said:
If you begin a day to day argument: " For all x such that..."

:smile: no! save me! It's not just in arguments either; non-mathematical language is just so clunky when one is trying to be precise. I mean, what's the english equivalent of (A+B+C)-(A+B)=(A+C)-(A)=C? The only thing I could come up with was "B cancels" :rolleyes:
 
When you begin to define everyone you know in terms of matrices representing their characteristics.
 
... if the following happens:

At the question period after a Dirac lecture at the University of Toronto, somebody in the audience remarked: "Professor Dirac, I do not understand how you derived the formula on the top left side of the blackboard."
"This is not a question," snapped Dirac, "it is a statement. Next question, please."
 
Edgardo said:
... if the following happens:

At the question period after a Dirac lecture at the University of Toronto, somebody in the audience remarked: "Professor Dirac, I do not understand how you derived the formula on the top left side of the blackboard."
"This is not a question," snapped Dirac, "it is a statement. Next question, please."
Alex Trebek is too much of a mathematician?
 
BobG said:
Alex Trebek is too much of a mathematician?

Yes, he is :biggrin:
 
Hurkyl said:
I can't remember it off hand, but there is at least one mathematical term that I use in everyday conversation, because there isn't an 'ordinary' English word that carries precisely the meaning I intend.


I find I use "if and only if"