Z Center of mass of an ice cream cone

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the center of mass (z com) of a composite solid consisting of an inverted right circular cone and a hemisphere, both with equal density. The original poster attempts to set up an integral to find the total z com of the two components, referencing known z com values for each shape.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the z com using the known centers of mass for the cone and hemisphere. There is uncertainty about how to integrate these components and whether integration is necessary given the known values.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on treating the two solids as point masses at their centers of mass, suggesting that the density cancels out. However, there remains confusion about the setup of the integral and the correct interpretation of the z com values, particularly regarding the inverted nature of the cone.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on using integrals and density relationships, but participants are questioning the necessity of integration given the derived centers of mass. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations regarding the approach to solving the problem.

Trish1234
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The z com of the entire ice cream cone, the base being an inverted right circular cone, the top a hemisphere. Equal density throughout. Must solve using integrals and density relationship.


Homework Equations


The z com of the top hemisphere (ice cream) is equal to 3/8 R
The z com of the lower section (cone) is equal to h/4


The Attempt at a Solution


m = density * volume
mt/mb = (2/3*PI*R^3) / (1/3*PI*R^2*h) = 2R/h
zcom = 1/M summation m*z
(h/2R) = summ (2/3*PI*R^3) * (3/8*R) + (1/3*PI*R^2*h) * (h/4)

To be honest, I have no clue what I am doing. I know I need to some how come up with a way, using the density relationship, to set up an integral and solve the total z com of the two solid components. I'm not sure if what I did above is on the right track. Please Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you were calculating on the final line, but the one before that is useful. You wrote "zcom = 1/M summation m*z" Try writing this out, don't worry that you are not given the density, write it in (just use a symbol like rho), and hopefully you'll find that it cancels out.
 
BruceW said:
I'm not sure what you were calculating on the final line, but the one before that is useful. You wrote "zcom = 1/M summation m*z" Try writing this out, don't worry that you are not given the density, write it in (just use a symbol like rho), and hopefully you'll find that it cancels out.

Hi BruceW,
My last line was my summation of the two z com components. I'm really not sure where to go with it. I am supposed to set up an integral, I just do not know what to put in the integral.
 
Your proposed solution involved using the "known" centers of mass of two geometric solids. In order to satisfy the question, it would be sufficient to derive those two centers of mass. You can do them separately.
 
Those two separate center of masses were derived, not given. I just don't know how to use those two in order to set up an integral to solve the center of mass of them combined.
 
Trish1234 said:
Those two separate center of masses were derived, not given. I just don't know how to use those two in order to set up an integral to solve the center of mass of them combined.

There's no integration required if you already have the masses and positions of the centers of masses of two objects. Treat then like point masses at their centers of mass.
 
Trish1234 said:
Hi BruceW,
My last line was my summation of the two z com components. I'm really not sure where to go with it. I am supposed to set up an integral, I just do not know what to put in the integral.

Hey Trish, welcome to physicsforums. gneill has the right idea for this problem. (although really you don't have the masses, but you do have the volumes, and since the density is the same, the density will cancel out).
 
Thanks. So I am on the right track with the summation. It just really confused me that he said to use integration. Maybe he just meant on the individual parts.

Thanks both for your help :)
 
The summation is close, but not quite right. The z values need to take account for the relative positions of the objects (and the fact that the cone is inverted), so they should not just be the z com values which were given
 
  • #10
Ok, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K