Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, problem 1.3.1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around problem 1.3.1 from Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell," focusing on verifying the exponential decay of the propagator D(x) for spacelike separation. Participants are exploring the mathematical properties and implications of the propagator's definition and its integral representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the variable x, questioning whether it represents a spatial vector or a 4-vector, and the implications of this distinction on the problem. There are attempts to evaluate the integral using spherical coordinates, with some participants noting mistakes in their earlier calculations. Others suggest that the integral may not have a solution in terms of elementary functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of the integral and exploring different mathematical approaches. Some have offered guidance on handling the integral's complexity, while others are still grappling with the implications of their assumptions and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the notation and the treatment of spacelike separation, as well as the challenges posed by the integral's structure and potential branch cuts. Participants are also considering the physical context of the problem in relation to the speed of light and the properties of the propagator.

Maurice7510
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working through Zee for some self study and I'm trying to do all the problems, which is understandably challenging. Problem 1.3.1 is where I'm currently stuck: Verify that D(x) decays exponentially for spacelike separation.

Homework Equations


The propagator in question is
$$ D(x) = -i \int \frac{d^3k}{2(2\pi)^3} \frac{e^{-i\boldsymbol{k}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}}}{\sqrt{\boldsymbol{k}^2+m^2}} $$

The Attempt at a Solution


Presumably, I would have to solve the integral and show that it decays exponentially (the spacelike aspect has already been taken into account for the above integral) and what I did was switch to spherical coordinates and integrated over the azimuthal:

$$ D = \frac{-i}{8\pi^2}\int dr\,d\theta\frac{e^{-irx\cos\theta}}{\sqrt{r^2+m^2}}r\cos\theta $$

This is where I'm stuck. The square root in the denominator suggests this is a branch cut integral but I haven't been able to find a source that explains it sufficiently. If anyone could help me figure this out I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maurice7510 said:

Homework Statement


I'm working through Zee for some self study and I'm trying to do all the problems, which is understandably challenging. Problem 1.3.1 is where I'm currently stuck: Verify that D(x) decays exponentially for spacelike separation.

Homework Equations


The propagator in question is
$$ D(x) = -i \int \frac{d^3k}{2(2\pi)^3} \frac{e^{-i\boldsymbol{k}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}}}{\sqrt{\boldsymbol{k}^2+m^2}} $$

I feel that there is something wrong with this equation. Does x mean a spatial vector, or a 4-vector? If it's a 4-vector, then there is a problem, because on the right-hand side of the equals sign, there is no mention of the time component of x. If x is a spatial vector vector, then it doesn't make any sense to talk about spacelike separations.
 
That is curious, though I wrote exactly what he has in the book. Initially, we have
$$ D(x) = -i \int \frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^32\omega_k}[e^{-i(\omega_kt - \boldsymbol{k}\cdot\boldsymbol{k})}\theta(x^0)+e^{i(\omega_kt - \boldsymbol{k}\cdot\boldsymbol{k})}\theta(-x^0)] $$
which he reduces to the above equation in consideration of spacelike separation where ##x^0= 0##. So I suppose the notation on the left is a four vector, it just happens to be ##x = (0, x^1, x^2, x^3) \equiv \boldsymbol{x}##.
 
I now realize I made a mistake in the spherical coordinate substitution, the integral should be
$$ D(x) = \frac{-i}{8\pi^2}
int dr\,d\theta \frac{e^{-irx\cos\theta}}{\sqrt{r^2+m^2}} r^2\sin\theta $$
The integral in ##\theta## is fairly straight forward at this point, and I got
$$ D(x) = \frac{-i}{4\pi x}\int dr \frac{r\sin(rx)}{\sqrt{r^2+m^2}} $$
which i now have no idea how to solve
 
Maurice7510 said:
I now realize I made a mistake in the spherical coordinate substitution, the integral should be
$$ D(x) = \frac{-i}{8\pi^2}
int dr\,d\theta \frac{e^{-irx\cos\theta}}{\sqrt{r^2+m^2}} r^2\sin\theta $$
The integral in ##\theta## is fairly straight forward at this point, and I got
$$ D(x) = \frac{-i}{4\pi x}\int dr \frac{r\sin(rx)}{\sqrt{r^2+m^2}} $$
which i now have no idea how to solve

That is because that integral has no solution in terms of elementary functions.
 
If you assume that the magnitude of the radial velocity is much less than the speed of light, then you can expand the denominator in the integral to second order in ## p_r ##.
##\sqrt{p^2 + m^2} = m\sqrt{1 + \frac {p^2} {m^2}} \approx m(1 + \frac {p^2} {m^2}) = \frac {(p - im)(p + im)} {m}##
The integral becomes
##D(x) \approx \frac {1} {2(2\pi)^2} \frac {m} {|x|} \int_{0}^\infty dr \frac {r[(-i) \sin(r|x|)]} {(r - im)(r + im)} = \frac {1} {2(2\pi)^2} \frac {m} {|x|} \mathcal {Im} \int_{0}^\infty dr \frac {r e^{-i|x|r}} {(r - im)(r + im)}##
We have simple poles at ##z_0 = \pm im##. We use the Cauchy Integral theorem and the residue theorem, closing a semi-circular contour in the lower half-plane, and noting that the integral along the arc tends to zero as the radius tends to ## \infty## and the integral along the real axis from ##-\infty ## to ##+\infty## is twice the integral from 0 to ## \infty##. We find,
##D(x) \approx \frac {1} {16\pi}\frac{m} {|x|}e^{-|x|m}##
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K