Zero most powerful quantity in the unvierse

  • Thread starter Thread starter Snipe65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zero
Snipe65
Hey dudes, quick question i have a paper due on Friday about zero, and i have some ok stuff about zero. I looked at the recent to the power of zero thread, and i am going to use that example in my paper. However when i try to use the search feature on this site it says there are no matches to zero or 0...

So if you could possibly post maybe a link to some threads in here about zero i'd really appreciate it :)

Didn't find anything useful on google either. I am doing a paper about Zero, how it is the most powerful quantity in the unvierse. So any proofs on it woudl be wickedly appreciated :D

Thx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The most powerful quantity in the universe? I think you're going to have some trouble proving that. Although it is indeed totally an opinion.
 
Its philosophy :P
 


Originally posted by Snipe65
However when i try to use the search feature on this site it says there are no matches to zero or 0...

A search for zer* works, the o is a wildcard, weird how zero doesn't return anything, even Zero is a member, so you would think all references to him would show up...hope I helped.:smile:
 
A book called Zero should help you if you can find it soon enough.
 
I did :D
On my seventh page. You know i just realized, i wrote seven pages about nothing...
Now that insane
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top