Zwiebach Ch 14.2 Homework: Coincident Branes in Figure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Are the branes in Figure 14.2 supposed to be coincident even though they are manifestly not in the drawing?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:
Are the branes in Figure 14.2 supposed to be coincident even though they are manifestly not in the drawing?
The paragraph beginning with the word 'Suppose' describes the figure and does not imply that the the branes are coincident. Then the next paragraph supposes that they are. The second paragraph implies (to me at least) that the first paragraph describes the case where the branes are not coincident. I would also say that the figure can be used to clarify both situations as long as you suppose that in the second case, the branes are coincident even though they are not drawn that way.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...

Similar threads

Back
Top