Zwiebach Section 12.4 Homework: M^2 = -p^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equation M^2 = -p^2 as presented in Zwiebach's text, specifically on page 221. Participants clarify that M represents the square of the four-momentum, while p denotes the three-momentum. The confusion arises from the distinction between four-momenta and three-momenta, with the four-momentum's square defined as P^2 = E^2 - p^2 or p^2 - E^2, depending on the metric used. The correct interpretation of these equations is crucial for understanding the energy-momentum invariant in the context of relativistic physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-momentum and three-momentum concepts
  • Familiarity with the energy-momentum invariant in relativistic physics
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations and their implications
  • Basic grasp of metric signatures in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the energy-momentum invariant in detail
  • Learn about the implications of different metric signatures in relativity
  • Explore the concept of four-vectors and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the role of Lorentz generators in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying relativity, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of energy-momentum relationships.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


On page 221 Zwiebach uses the "definition" M^2 = -p^2. I am not sure where this comes from since normally

m^2c^4 + p^2 c^2 = E^2

and even dropping the c's does not reduce to that.

EDIT: I see. It is the light-cone Lorentz generator of section 11.6. How is he getting the square of it though? Working it out with 11.76?

EDIT 2: Wrong again. It is the just the energy-momentum invariant since the p I wrote above was only a three-vector. So, why is it a capital M?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement


On page 221 Zwiebach uses the "definition" M^2 = -p^2. I am not sure where this comes from since normally

m^2c^4 + p^2 c^2 = E^2

and even dropping the c's does not reduce to that.

Don't confuse four-momenta with three-momenta. In M^2 = - P^2, P is a four-momentum. In your seond equation p is the three-momentum.

In any case, depending on the metric used, the square of the four-momentum may either be taken as P^2 = E^2-p^2 OR as p^2-E^2 which gives either +m^2 or -m^2 (setting c=1 everywhere)
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K