How does differentiation under the integral sign

AI Thread Summary
Differentiation under the integral sign is a technique that applies to integrals depending on a parameter, allowing for the differentiation of the integral with respect to that parameter. While it is possible to introduce parameters into any function, not all functions will yield useful results when applying this method. The technique is particularly effective for solving complex integrals that may not be solvable by standard methods, as highlighted by Feynman's experiences. Understanding when and how to apply this method is crucial, as it is not universally applicable. Mastery of this technique can enhance problem-solving abilities in calculus and analysis.
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
I've read about it before and now I'm trying to learn it myself from Woods 'Advanced Calculus' (as well as other resources like http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/analysis/diffunderint.pdf)

In the pdf, it says the method concerns integrals that depend on a parameter...now couldn't we make any function depend on a parameter?

For example inserting a parameter into f(x)=x^2 so it becomes f(x)=\alpha x^2

All the examples I've come across already have parameters in them so I'm not really sure. In 'Surely You're Joking, Mr Feynman!', Feynman says that he used this technique over and over again and often solved integrals that others couldn't using it. Would these integrals all be ones that depend on some parameter as well as a variable?

I'd like to know how exactly to use this method of integration and when to use it.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can always add parameters to your functions. It is not useful everywhere, but you can do it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top