Finding diameter of a wire based on the current and current density.

AI Thread Summary
To determine the correct diameter of a wire for a 0.9 A fuse that melts at a current density of 540 A/cm², the current density formula J = I/A is applied. The calculations initially yield an area of 0.16667 m², which is then used to find the radius using the formula A = πr². However, the conversion to diameter resulted in an incorrect value of 460.7 mm. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining unit consistency throughout the calculations to avoid errors. Proper tracking of units is crucial for accurate results in electrical engineering problems.
mkienbau
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
You need to design a 0.9 A fuse that "blows" if the current exceeds 0.9 A. The fuse material in your stockroom melts at a current density of 540 A/cm2. What diameter wire of this material will do the job?

540x10^-2=5.40 A/m^2

5.40= .9/x

Solving for x gives the answer: .166666666666667

Then:

.166666666667=pi(r^2)

sqrt(.166666666667/pi)=r

The result of that answer multiplied by 2 gives 4.607m. The answer asks for it in mm so I converted to 460.7mm and it says its wrong. Where did I go wrong, I'm just using the current density formula: J=I/A

Where J is the current density
I is the current
A is the area
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mkienbau said:
You need to design a 0.9 A fuse that "blows" if the current exceeds 0.9 A. The fuse material in your stockroom melts at a current density of 540 A/cm2. What diameter wire of this material will do the job?

540x10^-2=5.40 A/m^2

5.40= .9/x

Solving for x gives the answer: .166666666666667

Then:

.166666666667=pi(r^2)

sqrt(.166666666667/pi)=r

The result of that answer multiplied by 2 gives 4.607m. The answer asks for it in mm so I converted to 460.7mm and it says its wrong. Where did I go wrong, I'm just using the current density formula: J=I/A

Where J is the current density
I is the current
A is the area
Do what you did again, only this time keep track of your units every step along the way. Unit consistency will do wonders for you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top