Studying Modern VLSI Textbook Recommendations for Technological Advancements

  • Thread starter Thread starter leright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook Vlsi
AI Thread Summary
For those seeking an updated textbook on VLSI, "Digital Integrated Circuits" by Jan M. Rabaey is highly recommended, noted for its effectiveness in VLSI courses, although some users find it lacks depth in certain areas. Another strong option is "VLSI Circuit Design" by Kang and Leblebici, praised for its thoroughness and precise treatment of device physics, though it can be expensive. While Rabaey's video lectures are also beneficial, Kang and Leblebici's text is comprehensive, integrating device physics within the context of CMOS transistor-level design. Despite a professor's recommendation of Mead's 1980 text, it is considered outdated for current studies.
leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
VLSI textbook...

Could someone recommend me a good technologically up to date book on VLSI? I am studying the 4th edition of streetman right now, but the VLSI stuff is a bit outdated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Digital Integrated Circuits by Jan M. Rabaey is basically the textbook for VLSI. I've used it for two VLSI courses and it's very good.
 
Rabaey is popular, but a lot of people seem to complain that it's description of some important topics is somewhat incomplete.

Kang and Leblebici is actually very thorough, and treats things very rigourously - plus it describes the device physics very precisely as well. Downside - it can be rather expensive new.
 
Thank you both for your advice. I have been considering Rabaey, and I have been watching his video lectures posted on his website (they are quite good), but I will also consider Kang nd Leblebici. jbusc, I already have a grounding in solid state devices (I have already worked through Streetman cover to cover) so I am not looking for a devices text. I am looking for a text that focuses primarily on VLSI and integrated circuits.

The professor that typically teaches the VLSI course at my school recommended Mead, but it was published in 1980. That's an awful long time ago, especially in this subject...
 
Don't get me wrong, Kang+Leblebici is primarily a VLSI design text, and focuses primarily on design and methodology, etc., and assumes you've had some prerequisite course on basic solid state devices (though it does not really assume that much).

What I was trying to say was that it is comprehensive at the same time, and doesn't ignore the device physics (like some VLSI books do) but rather explains how they fit into the context of cmos transistor-level design.
 
jbusc said:
Don't get me wrong, Kang+Leblebici is primarily a VLSI design text, and focuses primarily on design and methodology, etc., and assumes you've had some prerequisite course on basic solid state devices (though it does not really assume that much).

What I was trying to say was that it is comprehensive at the same time, and doesn't ignore the device physics (like some VLSI books do) but rather explains how they fit into the context of cmos transistor-level design.

I'll check it out. Thanks a lot.
 
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hi everyone! I'm a senior majoring in physics, math, and music, and I'm currently in the process applying for theoretical and computational biophysics (primarily thru physics departments) Ph.D. programs. I have a 4.0 from a basically unknown school in the American South, two REUs (T50 and T25) in computational biophysics and two semesters of research in optics (one purely experimental, one comp/exp) at my home institution (since there aren't any biophysics profs at my school), but no...

Similar threads

Back
Top