Calculating Couple Moment - Explaining Negative Values

AI Thread Summary
Calculating couple moments involves understanding the direction of forces and their effects on rotation. The negative value in the equation indicates a clockwise rotation, which is conventionally assigned a negative sign. The discussion highlights confusion about the application of negative values and the origin of certain distance measurements in the calculations. It is clarified that clockwise moments are negative, while counter-clockwise moments are positive. Accurate interpretation of these conventions is essential for correctly solving couple moment problems.
unknown_2
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm having some difficulty calculating couple moment. i understand that \sumM = \sumFd. here's an example:
question.jpg

it asks to resolve the couple forces.

the answer is:
(4/5)(60lb) = 48lb
and
(40lb)(cos30)

\sumM = -(48lb)(4ft) + (40lb)(cos30)(8ft)

Now, i don't understand why "-(48lb)(4ft)" is negative. I'm not sure when to use a negative value. Can someone explain this to me?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unknown_2 said:
Hey, I'm having some difficulty calculating couple moment. i understand that \sumM = \sumFd. here's an example:
question.jpg

it asks to resolve the couple forces.

the answer is:
(4/5)(60lb) = 48lb
and
(40lb)(cos30)

\sumM = -(48lb)(4ft) + (40lb)(cos30)(8ft)

Now, i don't understand why "-(48lb)(4ft)" is negative. I'm not sure when to use a negative value. Can someone explain this to me?

Cheers

It's a matter of convention. Typically, the clockwise direction is negative and counter-clockwise is positive. So if the applied force causes rotation in the clockwise direction, the moment is negative and vice-versa.

CS
 
I don't see where '8 ft' comes in. Shouldn't that be 'd ft'?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top