Solve for charge(q), given radius, electric field, and density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the charge of an oil drop in Millikan's experiment using its radius, density, and the applied electric field. The user initially derived the charge using the formula q = (-4*pi*r^3*σ*g)/(3E) and calculated a value of -1.28 x 10^-18 C. After attempting to express this charge in terms of the elementary charge (e), the user mistakenly concluded it was -8e. Upon further review, it was clarified that the correct result was simply -8, indicating a misunderstanding in the conversion to elementary charge units. The final resolution emphasizes the importance of careful unit conversion and verification in physics calculations.
Lemon-Sam
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In Millikan's experiment, an oil drop of radius 1.73 μm and density 0.865 g/cm3 is suspended in chamber C when a downward electric field of 1.44 × 105 N/C is applied. Find the charge on the drop, in terms of e. (Tolerance of solution is +/- 2%)

Known:

radius, r = 1.73 μm x 10-6 m

density, σ = 0.865 x 103 kg/m3

Electric field, E = 1.44 × 105 N/C

magnitude of charge of electron, e = 1.6 x 10-19

gravitational constant, g = 9.8 m/s2

Homework Equations



1. Force due to electric field: F = -qE

2. Mass of the drop, m = (4pi/3)*r3

3. Force of gravity, F = mg = (4/3)*pi*r3*σ*g

The Attempt at a Solution



(1) I rearranged equations (1) & (3) from above to solve for q, thus:

q = (-4*pi*r3*σ*g)/3E

(2) I then plugged in the given values:

q = [-4*pi*(1.73 x 10-6m)3*0.865 x 103 kg/m3*9.8 m/s2]/(3*1.44 x 105 N/C)

= -1.28 x 10-18 C

(3) Now, to put the solution in terms of e, I divided my result from (2) by the magnitude of charge of electron, e:

q = (-1.28 x 10-18 C/1.6 x 10-19 C)(1e)

= -8e C

However, my answer is incorrect, and I'm not sure why. I also tried to reverse the sign of my solution, but that was incorrect as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
using the data I am getting

q=-3.83\times 10^{-18}\;\mathrm{C}

check math
 
I checked the math again, and it turns out that the correct result was just -8, instead of -8e. Thank you for your reply, Issac.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top