Making sure my intuition is correct about buoyant force

AI Thread Summary
Buoyant force is determined by fluid pressure, which depends on the depth below the surface rather than the height above the bottom of the container. The pressure at any point in the fluid increases with depth, meaning that the pressure at the bottom of a submerged object is greater than at the top, resulting in an upward net force. The correct approach to calculating buoyant force involves considering the height from the water surface to the bottom of the object, not from the bottom of the container. This understanding clarifies that the upward pressure acting on the submerged object is consistent regardless of its position in the container. Ultimately, recognizing that fluid pressure is depth-dependent resolves the initial confusion about buoyant force calculations.
Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Hi I want to make sure my intuition is correct about the buoyant force.
What I am confused by if we take a cube or some sort of object and its submerged at height H1 as in picture I uploaded,then their will be a force of P1 * A; in case of the cube it's it would be d^2. What I don't understand or I am not sure that my intuition is correct is this is why the height of H2(height 2 not Hydrogen gas :D) is taken from the top of the water to bottom of the cube instead of bottom of the water to the bottom of the cube as picture 2 represent.

My intuition to this is as follows since the upward pressure P2 is same throughout the liquid then P2 if taken from frame of reference from above of the beaker it would be the same that if taken from frame of reference from bottom of the beaker as picture 2 represent.Is that intuition is correct ?


Please look at picture as they explain better than I do.
Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Buoyance.JPG
    Buoyance.JPG
    6.2 KB · Views: 457
  • Buoyance 2.JPG
    Buoyance 2.JPG
    6.5 KB · Views: 470
Physics news on Phys.org
What matters is the fluid pressure at any point. That pressure depends on the depth below the surface, not the height above some bottom point.
 
Second picture is correct. So, for the pressure in point 1 you will take h1, and for the pressure in pont 2 you will take (h1+h2). O course, pressure in the point 2 will be greater than pressure in the point 1, and you will have resultant force upward. Now you have to calculate weight and you will see will the body be stable, go up, go down, or whatever..
 
The key point is that the pressure on the cube will be the same regardless of its distance from the bottom as long as its depth below the surface is the same. The height above the bottom of the container has no bearing on the fluid pressure.
 
I see what made me think this way about picture 1 is because is an upward force so I didn't visualize it correctly because I thought if its taken from bottom then it would make the resultant force upward not downward that's what made me confused.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Back
Top