Dark Matter: Interacting Particles & Gravitational Forces

AI Thread Summary
Dark matter is primarily thought to interact gravitationally, with weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) being a leading candidate for its constituents. There is debate about whether these particles should participate in weak interactions beyond detection purposes. Cosmological data suggests that dark matter must be "cold," indicating it likely consists of massive particles. Alternative candidates to WIMPs include axions and shadow matter, which also fit the cold dark matter model. The term "WIMP" refers to low interaction rates with normal matter rather than specifically to weak nuclear force interactions.
someGorilla
Messages
97
Reaction score
1
I didn't know where to post this. Astrophysics? Particle physics?
I know very little of dark matter. I've read that it's sometimes supposed to interact only gravitationally, and also that weakly interacting particles have been proposed as its constituents. Is there a reason why they should participate in weak interactions, other than the hope to be able to detect them?
 
Space news on Phys.org
There is good reason to believe DM is a WIMP, like a neutrino, but, somewhat less interactive. Neutrinos can pass through light years of lead without a collision.
 
someGorilla said:
I didn't know where to post this. Astrophysics? Particle physics?
I know very little of dark matter. I've read that it's sometimes supposed to interact only gravitationally, and also that weakly interacting particles have been proposed as its constituents. Is there a reason why they should participate in weak interactions, other than the hope to be able to detect them?

The cosmological data just says that dark matter has to be "cold" which means that it's likely to involve massive particles. The "weak" part comes from certain possible particle candidates, but there are cold dark matter candidates that aren't WIMPS, namely axions, shadow matter, and some other candidates.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4196
 
someGorilla said:
I didn't know where to post this. Astrophysics? Particle physics?
I know very little of dark matter. I've read that it's sometimes supposed to interact only gravitationally, and also that weakly interacting particles have been proposed as its constituents. Is there a reason why they should participate in weak interactions, other than the hope to be able to detect them?
The W in WIMP doesn't necessarily mean the weak nuclear force specifically. All it means is that they don't interact much with normal matter or each other. But yes, weak-force interacting dark matter is one common model for dark matter.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top