Talor series expansion of roots of algebraic equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on expanding the roots of the algebraic equation x^2 - 1 - εx = 0 using Taylor series. The roots are identified as x = ε/2 ± √(1 + ε^2/4). The proposed Taylor series expansion for x(1) is 1 + ε/2 + ε^2/8 + O(ε^3). It is suggested that the author expanded the root x in terms of ε before substituting it back into the equation, raising questions about the validity of this method. The binomial theorem is applied to simplify √(1 + ε^2/4) to 1 + ε^2/8 + O(ε^4).
marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
I have a algebraic equation like so:
x^2-1-εx=0

the roots are obviously-
x=ε/2±√(1+ε^2/4)

How can I expand the expression for the roots- as a taylor series?

the answer is given as:
x(1)=1+ε/2+ε^2/8+O(ε^3)

I am assuming the author expanded the root 'x' in terms of ε before hand and substituted in the algebraic.Is that even allowed?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use the binomial theorem on √(1+ε^2/4) = (1 + ε2/4)1/2 = 1+ε2/8 + O(ε4)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top