Angular Motion Of A Bullet Striking A Door

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the angular motion of a bullet striking a door and addresses several key questions related to angular momentum and energy conservation. Participants confirmed that the bullet does have angular momentum relative to the door's axis of rotation and discussed how to calculate it, emphasizing the importance of the distance from the hinges. Mechanical energy is not conserved in this perfectly inelastic collision, as the kinetic energy of the bullet is not fully transferred to the door. The conversation also clarified how to determine the moment of inertia of the door and the correct distance from the hinges for calculating angular momentum. Ultimately, one participant successfully solved the problem after clarifying the configuration of the door and bullet.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
The problem is:

"A 0.00600-kg bullet traveling horizontally with a speed of 1.00*103 m/s enters an 19.2-kg door, imbedding itself 8.60 cm from the side opposite the hinges as in the figure below. The 1.00-m wide door is free to swing on its frictionless hinges.

(a) Before it hits the door, does the bullet have angular momentum relative the door's axis of rotation? Yes? No?

(b) If so, evaluate this angular momentum. (If not, enter zero.)

(c) Is mechanical energy of the bullet-door system constant in this collision? Yes? No? (Answer without doing a calculation.)

(d) At what angular speed does the door swing open immediately after the collision?

(e) Calculate the energy of the bullet-door system and determine whether it is less than or equal to the kinetic energy of the bullet before the collision."

I think I will be able to solve parts (d) and (e).

For (a), the answer is yes, but I can't quite figure out why the answer is yes.

For (c), the answer is no; but I am having trouble understanding how we can possibly know. Couldn't the kinetic energy of the bullet be completely absorbed as kinetic energy in the door? In this scenario, wouldn't mechanical energy be conserved?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,356
Physics news on Phys.org
Bashyboy said:
For (a), the answer is yes, but I can't quite figure out why the answer is yes.
How is the angular momentum of a particle defined?

For (c), the answer is no; but I am having trouble understanding how we can possibly know. Couldn't the kinetic energy of the bullet be completely absorbed as kinetic energy in the door? In this scenario, wouldn't mechanical energy be conserved?
When the colliding objects end up merged and traveling together, that is a perfectly inelastic collision. You can show (using conservation of momentum) that mechanical energy cannot be conserved. Only when they bounce off each other can energy be conserved.
 
Angular momentum of a particle is found to be the product linear momentum of the particle and the particle's distance from the axis of rotation. Yes, I see now. I do have another question, however; for part (d), how do I calculate the momentum of inertia of the door?
 
Bashyboy said:
I do have another question, however; for part (d), how do I calculate the momentum of inertia of the door?
You can treat it like a thin rod.
 
I don't have the entire length of the door, though.
 
Bashyboy said:
I don't have the entire length of the door, though.
Use the 'width' of the door, which is given.
 
Okay, I got parts (b), (d), and (e) wrong.

Part (b): L=(0.00400~kg)(1.00\cdot 10^3~m/s)(8.10\cdot 10^{-2}~m)=0.324~kg\cdot m^2/s

For (d), L_i=L_f \rightarrow (0.324~kg\cdot m^2/s)+0=[(0.00400~kg)((8.10\cdot 10^{-2}~m/s)^2+1/3(15.8)(1.00~m)^2] \omega \rightarrow \omega = 0.0615~rad/s

For (e), I solved for the initial kinetic energy, and got it right; but I apparently didn't properly solve the final kinetic energy: K_f=1/2(0.00400~kg)((8.10\cdot 10^{-2}~m/s)^2+1/3(15.8)(1.00~m)(0.0615~rad/s)^2= 0.00997 J
 
Last edited:
Bashyboy said:
Part (b): L=(0.00400~kg)(1.00\cdot 10^3~m/s)(8.10\cdot 10^{-2}~m/s)=0.324~kg\cdot m^2/s
I don't understand what are doing here. What's the momentum of the bullet? How far is it from the axis?
 
0.081 m, right? I accidentally put units of velocity with that number.
 
  • #10
Bashyboy said:
0.081 m, right? I accidentally put units of velocity with that number.
That's not right. How did you determine that distance?
 
  • #11
Well, in the problem it states that the bullet is embedded into the door at a distance of 8.60 cm from the hinges from the door, so I took that to be the distance...Oh, I calculated 8.1 cm...Was that the error?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Bashyboy said:
Well, in the problem it states that the bullet is embedded into the at at a distance 8.60 cm from the door, so I took that to be the distance...Oh, I calculated 8.1 cm...Was that the error?
The bullet hits 8.60 cm from the side opposite the hinges (see the figure). What's the distance to the axis?
 
  • #13
Oh, 8.60 cm is the distance from where the bullet hits the door to the edge of the door not containing the hinges? If that's the case, I wouldn't know the other distance.
 
  • #14
Bashyboy said:
Oh, 8.60 cm is the distance from where the bullet hits the door to the edge of the door not containing the hinges? If that's the case, I wouldn't know the other distance.
You have the width of the door.
 
  • #15
But how is that the distance from the axis of rotation (hinges) to the other end of the door?
 
  • #16
Bashyboy said:
But how is that the distance from the axis of rotation (hinges) to the other end of the door?
How wide is the door ?
 
  • #17
1.0 m, and then it's length is 8.60 m plus the distance beyond the bullet.
 
  • #18
The door is 1 meter wide. Therefore the far edge of the door is 1 meter from the edge with the hinges.

How far is the bullet from the hinges?

(The figure is from a perspective looking down on the door.)
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Oh, I see. I thought that the 1.0 m was how thick it was (width); it's the length of it.
 
  • #20
I SOLVED IT! Thank you both for your help!
 
  • #21
Bashyboy said:
Oh, I see. I thought that the 1.0 m was how thick it was (width); it's the length of it.

Bashyboy said:
I SOLVED IT! Thank you both for your help!
It's good to hear that you solved the problem -- apparently with ease -- once you fully understood the configuration.

Sometimes it's not the big concepts which keep us from solving problems, but the small details ! :smile:

SammyS
 
Back
Top