Value of the constant in 'variation of refractive index'

Donchay
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In optics, given the below formula

nλ= A + B/λ2 + C/λ4 +...

where A, B and C are constants.

From the above relationship we can deduce that as the wavelength λ increases, the variation of refractive index nλ decreases.

How do we measure the constant value of A,B and C at the first place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You measure the refractive index at several wavelengths and then you fit the formula to the values obtained.
 
Thank You DrDu.
While the above formula is for Optical Dispersion, then is it the same dispersion for the Abbe Number:

Vd=(nD-1)/nF-nC

where nF-nC is the dispersion according to this link http://glassproperties.com/abbe_number/

but somehow on other link I read that nF-nC is called Principal Dispersion. I try to search on more about Principal Dispersion but there is almost none explanation about it.
 
n_F is the index of refraction for blue light while n_C is for red light (see the table with the line frequencies).
One assumes that for glass the dispersion is approximately linear over the optical frequency range.
 
I understand about the line frequencies. Just that is it n(lambda)=n_F - n_C ?
 
I would try something like ## n(\lambda)=n_C+(n_F-n_C)\frac{1/\lambda_C^2-1/\lambda^2}{1/\lambda_C^2-1/\lambda_F^2} ##.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top