How Do You Calculate Terminal Velocity Involving Drag?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation for terminal velocity of a falling body, incorporating drag proportional to speed. The user initially set up the equation m*dv/dt = mg - bv and attempted to integrate it but encountered confusion regarding the sign during integration. It was clarified that a mistake was made by not accounting for the negative sign while integrating, which is crucial for the correct formulation. The user realized that dividing the entire equation by -b from the start would have simplified the process. The exchange highlights the importance of careful attention to signs in differential equations.
spacetimedude
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hello PF,
I have once simple (well, not so simple for me) question.

I'm trying to derive an equation for the velocity of a falling body with accordance to terminal velocity.

The equation incorporates drag proportional to the speed.

m*dv/dt=mg-bv

and

mg/b=terminal velocity vt

So the steps I took were:

m*dv/dt+bv=mg

(m/b)*(dv/dt)+v=vt

dv/dt=(b/m)(vt-v)

dv/(vt-v)=(b/m)dt

Integrating both sides would give
ln[(vt-v)/(vt)]=(b/m)t

But the textbook says that I'm supposed to get negative (b/m)t on the left side.

Have I made a mistake on the integration part?

Any help will be deeply appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm. I seem to have gotten the answer if I just divided the entire equation by -b in the beginning without bringing the bv to the left side. Have I made a mistake on the integration part?
 
You just missed the minus sign while integrating (chain rule)
 
pshh. I can't believe I missed that. Thanks so much king vitamin!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top